this sounds more luck based than a neutral killer that instantly dies if two random players die
good thing that doesn’t exist
i’m just saying
lich was a poorly designed neutral killer, even by FoL standards
I still had it in virtuous 1 lmao
i crave neut showdown 4
i’m just saying
to win you would have to have BOTH your holders survive to final 3
you literally could not win otherwise
You had it in virtuous 2
I was king only once
and i got rekt
Also this one was even more broken because he won at F4 lmao
SFoL 00
“person who dies if two selected players die and also those people are instantly revealed to investigatives who target them”
the idea that lich is strong is wrong
What about this dude
arsonist plaguebearer
'nuff said
we already got rid of electrician
Headhunter isn’t nearly as bad as half of these classes
definitely not biased
I buffed electromancer
i will say though
it actually seems decently balanced
it shares traits with sorcerer
it’d be busted if charged people always spread
Yeah but in general relying on others’ visits isn’t great because it takes agency out of your hands