Queue/Submit Discussion Thread

[ChopChop]

@Marshal

To elaborate, you have consistently shown ideas of balance and what goes in to your games is not generally something others on this forum would consider fun. As far as balance, reviewers themselves do not let your games pass because the contents of them are simply not considered enjoyable by the standards of this community.

As far as you as a host, your general pattern of behavior has been shown to be careless about rules themselves. A host’s job is to host their game and make it as fun as reasonably possible for the players and I, at least, have no faith in you to do this well because of your previous patterns of behavior.

Have you seen me host before?

[ChopChop]

Mini 2144: Yu-Gi-Oh Card UPick Game Over - Good Cards Win. • Mafiascum.net

Heres one of the games I’ve hosted

[ChopChop]

Not all my games are unbalanced (Although this one was) but I mean I suppose I can grab a Co-Host If that’s what you would need from me.

[ChopChop]

I just have allot of ideas and it’s hard to find a place to host one of them at.

[Wazza]

Seth I believe it’s more of a distrustment sort of thing. When you first arrived to the forums you were instantly toxic for absolutely no reason and decided to throw a game for Town when they were in a bad spot by hammering themself, that would’ve been forgiven and frankly it basically has been completely forgotten about.

But I believe that’s a lesser issue to the amount of times you’ve been warned for doing bad things such a claiming to strategically replace out and also not to mention you’ve had so many games you’ve put up for review that have been denied that I’m positive the reviewers are just constantly hovering over an instant ‘deny’ button for you due to the lack of understanding what should be balanced in a game. You had a Mafia IC in a non-bastard game which is just beyond unbalanced and I’m pretty sure the reviewers just see you as constantly making the same mistake over and over again in a game you create. Some games are savable by the reviewer. If the reviewer can’t save it, how do you expect the co-host to?

Also the example you posted here was bad because it was an unbalanced game, if you want people to trust the game you’ve created then it would probably be better to post a game that is balanced.

[Icibalus]

also i have to point out that Upicks aren’t meant to be unbalanced
obviously the constraints mean it will be a bit more rough-around-the-edges than other games
but they’re still meant to be balanced, in my view

[ChopChop]

@Wazza

Seth I believe it’s more of a distrustment sort of thing. When you first arrived to the forums you were instantly toxic for absolutely no reason and decided to throw a game for Town when they were in a bad spot by hammering themself, that would’ve been forgiven and frankly it basically has been completely forgotten about.

But I believe that’s a lesser issue to the amount of times you’ve been warned for doing bad things such a claiming to strategically replace out and also not to mention you’ve had so many games you’ve put up for review that have been denied that I’m positive the reviewers are just constantly hovering over an instant ‘deny’ button for you due to the lack of understanding what should be balanced in a game. You had a Mafia IC in a non-bastard game which is just beyond unbalanced and I’m pretty sure the reviewers just see you as constantly making the same mistake over and over again in a game you create. Some games are savable by the reviewer. If the reviewer can’t save it, how do you expect the co-host to?

Also the example you posted here was bad because it was an unbalanced game, if you want people to trust the game you’ve created then it would probably be better to post a game that is balanced.

My 1-shots is very balanced and very basic.

[ChopChop]

@Icibalus

also i have to point out that Upicks aren’t meant to be unbalanced
obviously the constraints mean it will be a bit more rough-around-the-edges than other games
but they’re still meant to be balanced, in my view

Oh did you see that before?
You go on MafiaScum as well don’t you?

[ChopChop]

How about this.
How about I show someone else first and then I show a reviewer.

[Wazza]

Reviewers are specifically the people you are meant to show though.

That’s just adding a reviewer before the reviewer.

[thepigeonnyc]

I mean, I’d be fine with seeing the setup/OP.

[Emilia]

we need reviewers who review decisions of other reviewers

[DatBird]

thats why we have a review team

[Emilia]

but do u have a team to review the reviewers?

[Chloe]

lying darkness

[Zone_Q11]

@Emilia

we need reviewers who review decisions of other reviewers

@Emilia

but do u have a team to review the reviewers?

One problem: [More reviewers = Less players] when it comes to Standard (AKA closed setup) FMs.

[ChopChop]

I mean 1-Shots is pretty much an Open Setup if you all want me to post it here.
You can still look at it and join the game.

[ChopChop]

It’ll be shown anyway in sign ups

[ChopChop]

Although it’s possible that there may be some unbalanced so.

@Arete

Do I have permission to make a post where I can have others help me to make it more balanced?
It’s that some of the 1-Shots could be too good or it could be too much and needs less amount of 1-Shots to get.

[Arete]

If it’s an open setup, that’s fine