This is what I did on Eli, it lead me to believe he’s scum so I posted my “Eli is scum” ISO analysis.
you know, a wolf can just say they aren’t doing it intentionally
are you just going to take their word for it
I have no detailed thoughts when it comes to Wazza atm. My vibe detector isn’t a fan but that’s about it
I can iso them in a bit - kinda having a busy day
And yeah blue is prollably just town lmao
@Wazza after u explain this
why did you choose eli specifically
to me it just looks like you deliberately chose an LHF to push after doing like nothing the entire game
I’m not saying that, Eli was the one who said it and I commented on what he said. This has no business with me. Eli was the one who mentioned it as seen in the quote.
I was told too, you even commented on the post nearby what I said.
Low Hanging Fruit
disagree with this playstyle
that’s called going in with a conclusion in mind and will lead to conf-bias
its likely that whichever perspective you choose first will taint your view on the second go-around
and reading your eli iso is a giant case of ‘conclusion first, reasonings later’ which i dislike and find somewhat wolfy
can you at the very least post your iso from the perspective where hes a villager too if you’re going to play that way?
2 Likes
That’s why I said to do both, however, as I said in the post, it’s a tip not something to do, if you’re finding it hard to do something then you can go for it to give yourself some sort of help. I understand how hard it is to try and read a player when you have no idea, which is why I prefer to take it in both perspectives.
Really? For me I more see it as an equal match. The first will taint your second view, but the second view will be more in your head than the first. It equals out in a way to me, nothing is going to be perfect and it’s always up to interpretation which one you do first since that’s more than likely the side you believe more to be the truth anyway. Meaning you either get that first view instantly of the bat and only that, or the person thinks about both sides of the coin instead. Which would you prefer? Someone to instantly push on one of their reads or to think about both sides of what a player could be.
What do you mean?
I didn’t write it out, I read it like I said, I posted my Eli is scum analysis instead.
And no, I’m not going to post a Eli is town version. I believe Eli to be scum, I’m not going to try and convince people that he’s town just because you want me to post both sides. You can analyse him yourself, be a devil’s advocate forsay.
1 Like
why did you include my second quote in that lmao
since it’s there do u feel like answering it
…to show that you responded to the post where I talked about the ISO’s, thus your post about ‘why did you do this ISO on this player’ despite me blatantly stating I would a while ago was stupid.
The main purpose of my post was to respond to min, you’re blatantly being ignorant towards posts I respond too. I made my comment on a question I was asked about, if it achieves something then it achieves something, if it achieves nothing then it doesn’t matter since I still stated what I currently saw about Eli and PKR. You seem to think that I would just ignore a question I was asked while I was in the thread.
I guess our brains might operate differently then - which is fair. or maybe im misunderstanding what you’re saying
Every time I try something like this (not just in FM) I come out on the other side heavily leaning in the direction of whatever i did first since i cant shove it out of my mind when i have to do the second. It’ll exist there, nagging at me
Might just be a me thing i guess
shrugze
I didn’t really word it i the way i was meaning
What i meant is it felt like you were trying to find a way to paint everything eli has done as wolfy, without considering if it could come from town
1 Like
what does saying “PKR doesn’t like being voted” do to progress the game
how does it help to determine his alignment
don’t say words for the sake of saying words