[SFM] Deus Ex 20th Anniversary - Enemy Within 4 - Illuminati wins

Wdym

I was making joke

I’m hoping so (scum) soul could just not kill

Oh yes but eevee a claim role card (don’t mind scum normally getting fake claims) and asked mod a question that would couldn’t see that’s mech confirmed please blindly ignore that and never push or dare vote eevee.

… Like come on I do want to know a actual reason to trust you then fake mech

soul is lonely in his scum chat awww hey soul wanna join mine

Yeah no wolfers since day 1 in mine

1 Like

This is a joke

Do not write a wallpost and spam joycats

Nah I’m just finding it hard to comprehend how people are under the impression eevee would be confirmed at this point because he had prior knowledge of this game and knew a lot of the characters names and fake claims.

I do want more awnsers then I’m ā€œconfirmed for x, y and zā€ which actually historicly has no reason or truth behind it.

I want to know the reasoning why I can trust eevee and in good faith push min/whys knowing theirs a 99% chance one is scum

Well there is the metagame thing :roll_eyes:

Soul, you are pushing yourself into worse and worse position.

It was hard proof that role like mine existed in that setup before. You decided to reduce it to ā€œempty flavor and fake mechā€.
You first complained about me metagaming then started complaining that I don’t give direct answers to avoid modkill, then when Whys digged out half of the answer, started complaining that it doesn’t matter (cause it’s fake mechanics and empty flavor).

Like… I didn’t even want to claim the flavor, Whys and you forced me there.

It starts to look like that instead of analyzing, you did that mostly to throw shade for tommorow.

So yes, I want you to show me something you consider is clearing you.
Anything.
Becouse I start to lose my trust in you.

Of course you would start to not trust me as soon as I say it but you’re perfectly fine with people being fine ignoring you because you cannot handle the fact I’m trying to actually solve?

It is possible empty favour I’m sorry but no, none of thos confirms you in a closed setup, infact I’m guessing scum probably got at least one named character for the reason to not auto confirm people.

And yes that was a non game related sidenote where I noted if you had actually publicly proven you extended the day that you were meta gaming.

Which you never did btw.

You post hinted at it after the day extention… But that was one of your big talking points why you couldn’t be scum

Nah i probably shouldn’t have talked out if you aren’t scum (because that makes me look worse), but if you are I’m glad I’ve actually put some thoughts other then ignoring you.

How does it matter if scum got named character or not?

I literally proven my role existed in previous Deus Ex.

How does my role existing in previous game as unique role, who was a joat, who was named as an agent, who has agent flavor here…

Has no reason behind it.

Or even screw the flavor part and let’s stay on role itself.
If it has no reason or truth behind it, like… show me that this role didn’t exist in Deus Ex before I guess?

You are pushing me for things which I cannot answer by forum rules and then pushing me for not outing them.

Even warning me before that it’s against rules.

Like, wtf is this behavior.

Ok but you know like how does that confirm you its a closed setup with fake claims for that reason…

Holy shit… Like you cannot comprehend how a claim just because is was in a previous game doesn’t confirm you.

I’m not trying to get you to post stuff that breaks the rules, my point was that was one of your arguments

You was the one complaining I don’t post more after you said it’s metagaming and asked even more questions about it.

So no.

Let me give you a example i remember on the Tos forums they had a danganronpa 3 favour

One of the main characters ā€œsaihara shuichiā€ was a usuable fake claim.

I’m pretty sure previous games had him as a role and other fake claims ect, I probably can’t find this thread anymore but this was my main experience with closed setups