you cannot defend your reasoning so you decided to go this way?
there is if that vig is targeting town
Alright then Hja. Yes, I cannot defend my reasoning.
Now bloody claim before I blow your brains out, fool.
That vigilante is not targetting town.
The only time you EVER protect a vigilante shot is if the player being shot is mechanically confirmed town, in which case only you’d know and the vigilante does not and that is a very rare occurance.
no for example they are townreading that player
I dont need to claim to defend my slot
A townread isn’t enough for them to attempt to throw their life away. Especially since they know they are 100% without a doubt town, and they are only townreading the player.
You need to claim to prevent your brains from blowing.
You need to claim if you’re town to prevent a guilt vigilante from dying.
You need to claim if you’re town to prevent yourself from dying.
they arent throwing their life away for that
“I am town protective. I can see my own role, so I know I am town. This person appears to be town to me, but I will not throw my life away to save theirs because they are not mechanically confirmed to be town, and they are not claiming important town.”
protective will do that for me
If kyo is a townvig, then we can consider town prot to be a bodyguard, who will die protecting you.
Hja the fact I am shooting you instead of inside a 50/50 should be enough for you to realise your slot is doomed without a claim.
You will not be protected.
and I say we consider them to be a doctor
If what kyo is saying is exact, he will still guilt suicide if the prot is a doctor.
I will be protected because you cant defend your reasoning simple
well better than letting them vig a townie
and no thats not how guilt vig works
I have managed to defend my reasoning and disprove yours.
This is another reason why you are dying.