How is imitating a town meta not relevant to this conversation?
Oh wait, it disproves your argument. Right.
No if you show me 1 time someone imitated their town meta it doesnāt disprove the read
Two times, perhaps? Maybe if you did it right now, weād be able to prove this.
OH, WAIT
Nope
This is a lost cause.
Hja claim now, or Iām definitely shooting you no matter what you say and then weāll see who is shouting gamethrow after you let yourself be shot by a guilt vig
No thatās not how meta works if someone fakes their town meta it already means that there was a meta to begin
Lost cause for you
Hja isnāt claiming, knowing theyāll be vigged for it. And says kyo is throwing because of it
I just hope I will be protected
Hja Iād like to remind you I am the one with the gun.
Do not claim and die
^ This is how you do the clap thing, not after the last word.
Iām Italy and I still approve of this message.
And I am the one with protective since you canāt make any reason for me being scum that you can defend
Hja there will be no protectives on you unless theyāre scum illuminati
@Italy remember the stonewall
I neither confirmed nor denied a stonewall ability.
Town that see how you canāt defend any reason you make to scumread me
You havenāt given 1 reason you can defend
You canāt defend yourself Hja.
We have literally defended and proved our reasoning.
All you have is āSELF-METAā
We have successfully defended self-meta reasoning.
You are repeating yourself I answered your reasoning and you couldnāt defend it before now you just keep saying that I am scum with basically no reasoning
All you have is failed attempt to prove why metareads are bad and saying how much you donāt like self-meta