It’s very similar to you lul, at least the first part,
Very uninterested in actually solving. Once they were forced to do so anyways, they bring incredibly bad ungenuine reads to the table. Apparently scumreading a “slanker” with I think 100 posts at the time (Amelia), while they were slanking themselves. I’d rather have a more inactive slot die.
something like that, yeah. instead of actually reading a player, people just read exclusively based off of how they normally play. you’re a player that i’ve seen people do this to quite a few times, “emilia did this they’re locktwon” and im pretty sure marshal did that this game >.>
so you’re saying that non-obvious reads, very subliminal things such as how a player presents themselves unknowingly would make for better meta reads? cause if so, i can see that being true
i’ve seen some more ‘obvious’ metas be sheeped quite hard though so i don’t think every player here exactly thinks of it like you are here
That is true I am also saying that “confirmed” (basically meta’s that has been tested to work for long times) can work well and ones that are rooted in personality of person
As I clarified before I think there can be some more “confirmed” meta’s especially when there are small amount of players who play with each other for long time
i think i get what you’re saying and i don’t disagree with what you’re saying for the most part
in my wallpost i didn’t really touch on the more subtle metas of some people which can be very telling, which, if that’s what you mean by metareads, i can’t really say are bad