[SFM] Evolution Mafia [Mafia wins]

Like what you do rn for me is:

  1. N.1 is scum, so scum tried to save them from lynch.
  2. Scum tried to saved them from lynch, so following people are suspicious (Katze, Emilia, Jake).
  3. Following people are suspicious and they tried to save N.1, so N.1 is scum.

For me your logic is literally going in circles.

Do you believe the Amelia Wagon is 100% pure? I just don’t see it.

I’m focused on the fact that there has to be scum on Amelia wagon. Marshal is apparently flipping by EoD which will allow an analysis of him and his wagon, but right now the only wagon we can analyze without a reasonable doubt is the one that flipped.

N.1 was a non-vote and a large wagon at the time. The scum equity on that slot is based on whether a CFD was made by someone on The Amelia wagon.

I mean, probably not, but it’s weird that this is base for all your assumptions.

I just don’t really care about it.
If vote is weird, I scumread it, if it’s natural, I don’t bother.

No need for “There HAS to be scum here!!!1111ONEone” as base of it.

If you want to push Katze for weird vote, do it.
If you want to push N.1 for being counterwagon, do it.

No need to do the weird round stuff basing on assumption which not necessarly has to be true.

That being said, I would recommend rereading votes with question “Is that vote coming from scum?” rather than “Which of this votes come from scum?”.

You might find more than 1 scum this way (cause rn you kinda searched for 1 from many, but it might be more), or figure out that wagon is pure in the end.

But yeah.

Like if you want to analyze votes, then just analyze votes.

Don’t come to it with weirdly closed PoV that one of them has to be scum and others have to be town.

I know this isn’t your first time playing with me, Eevee. :man_shrugging:

I said that I’m not using meta in my games.

And mostly becouse I have terrible memory to it for anyone whose names doesn’t start with Marsh

1 Like

I like unconventional methods of finding scum, similar to how you usually do. Different methods, same intent.

Actually I remember also meta of a guy called Marshmallow, so yeah

Anybody can act townie or just chill in the null pool. Looking into voting patterns is more telling.

This method is what pinged me about SDA D1. It was weird. I wasn’t meta reading him because that’s how he plays as both alignments, so you can’t focus on that. You CAN focus on a weird vote, though.

Okay, so you suspected those 3 people from VCA, I get it.
So you isoed this trio and you came to conclusion that Katze was most suspicious of them.

I mean, I kinda counter that them stealing last evo point yesterday was townie plus kill which avoided protective with them being only protective among people with evo points says they are town rather than scum.

Holdup

Did I miss a Katze protective claim?

It was implied.

I take all implied claim and just use them on base that mafia has like what… 4 people to notice them AND they look out for those.

So if I notice something, mafia would probably too.
Especially that I wasn’t even specially looking for it that game.

That’s also why I believe 2nd point to Katze’s protective is better than 1st point for Squid’s investigative.

Like… weak investigative role like motiond etector or something is not gonna bring any information tbh.

However you can’t go wrong with strong protective.

^ That’s evo-voting wise

Who would you say would be most likely guarded last night?

i’m baaaaaaaack but agaaaaaaaain

Considering they will be juggling between protective path and hider path to protect self… no idea.

I wouldn’t bother asking.

If they want to protect self via hider path on some nights, that’s fine

I don’t think I agree with this logic.