[SFM] Insurgency: Fire Emblem: GOHWT766FM DeadChat

I did notice it, except that they weren’t anything unfakeable.

My anger doesn’t need buildup. It builds up until I snap. I don’t just leave little trails of anger lmao

You can say that about anything in that situation

A lot of the reads from players like Ob were harder to fake, which is why I wasn’t SR’ing him as hard as you.

sorry my reads weren’t unique enough??? If I was near braindead D1 and just memed I would have been fine apparently

Leafia just chose a player in the PoE to self resolve.

This is not sketchy at all.

1 Like

You ignored my latest reads, you were stuck in your bias by then.

Once you build a tunnel you drown in it.

whoever killed you right after that mislynch honestly wanted to troll us btw

making us be the only two in dead chat

EG’s wolfgame is shit so he’s an easy tonal read.

Italy’s permanently in the PoE because of his attitude.

I didn’t want to lynch Cheese because of wagonomic-related reasons. Most of my townreads were on you, which reinforced my vote.

sigh


anyways, all of what you said made sense, until the end when you got stuck in your tunnel

i was fine being lynched, but when you got delusional i snapped

To be honest, I tunneled you because you simultaniously said that I’m suspicious, but at the same time you.

A) Believed my read on EG.

B) Began insulting me calling an arrogant town or shit like it.

After wards I was pretty much set on the lynch.

Why the fuck isn’t anyone pointing out that the only thing Leafia is doing is parroting villagers without doing anything else?

You would have made that read as wolf too.

Wolves don’t always lie.

Because you are, and I’ll say this, it isn’t AI for me to insult egomaniacs.

What if EG was a wolf with me?

As I said yesterday, I won RM4 by shoving both my partners in the towncore and people went along with it.

What if this, what if that, it’s about probabilities, and the probability was no association.