It says at least 1 but not all 3 Neutrals are in the game.
It shows 3 Neutral Roles, yet you talk about specifically the Redacted one and not the Jester or Serial Killer.
If someone wanted to take a stab at the redacted one, assuming that only one of the 3 neutrals could be the one which rolled then there’d be a 1/16*1/3 chance of getting it correct or a 1/48.
The Jester also will make us more cautious to lynch which is understandable but provides protection to the other 2 potential neutrals if jester didn’t roll.
How would the other “two” be bogus?
It has the chance to flip but it’s still possible.
What’s your definition of bogus?
And I said 1/3 because there are 3 roles and a potential of only 1 to flip.
While it might not be entirely 1/3 I consider it as such and I still don’t understand why you so called mentioned the “retracted” to be in the game but never mentioned the Jester or the SK.
As such I think your the Retracted role.
Not sure what that means but, I think he mentioned his own role and thought it was confirmed in the game so he brought it up in attempt to make people think he isn’t it.
The start is good, but the finish is shaky. I just don’t see enough evidence for that. Tmi- too much information. Saying that he knew too much about the game (that there was the redacted role in it.)
I’m not discounting it, but it’s too easy to chalk it up to a simple misunderstanding. One that I was personally confused about, as well. Notice how one of my first things asked about a role list?