i think this would make wazzas anticlaim wincon impossible, and while that wincon is a bit ridiculous i think a better warning would have been
“claiming can lead to massive consequences” or something
emphasize it’s bad but don’t say “lol u lose”
i think wazza’s status was as a neutral killer, and the anticlaim wincon wasn’t actually meant to be something that set off this easily
1 Like
“Claiming any aspect of your role can lead to serious consequences”
i think that would be better
1 Like
a better win condition would have been as follows:
Defeat the Shadowlands and any harmful neutrals, if they exist (they might or might not exist).
4 Likes
the thing that contributed most to wazza’s win was definitely the fact that our wincon had no room for neuts
Arete is right that our classcard-written win condition this game was violated based on how the game ended.
Also I’m sorry that I played so ineptly this game arete
But it is true that my level of activity is NAI
Meanwhile, there were 3 nuffians who literally did nothing, and suddenly hear that the game is over without them even doing anything.
And yet I still count this as a loss, since I signed up for this. It’s a disappointing imbalanced shitty game (since it didn’t mention anywhere that neut can insta-win), but a game nonetheless.
I asked the host if there was a Neutral Killer and he said there could be so it’s not too much of a biggie for me
I mean we claimed with a known anticlaim and we got what we deserved so I can’t complain too much
There is a distinct difference between “you” and “us”; “we” didn’t do shit. Not even claiming. “You” were the ones who claimed.
Let’s make faction war.
Town who claimed
Town who didn’t claim
Mafia (I assume none claimed)
Wazza
