Because he probably wasn’t thinking to wait and he then decided to change his claim when tsu did so scum can make mistakes and dumb moves
it’s not logic
it’s factual
even if i am pushing agenda because you think i scum, it doesn’t change that my post is factual
it is not
you saying you agree on a scumread of TL for the reasons you said is your opinion not fact.
ah well that’s the thing
the agreeing part is my opinion
but my reasons are factual and you are still refusing to comment on them
that is exactly how it works
say in a game of ToL someone is outted as evil and they say ‘i may be evil, but 4 claimed roleblocked and there are no possible roleblockers so they are also evil’
the outted individual may be evil, may have agenda to push and may think 4 is evil (an opinion)
but it doesn’t change the factuality of what they said about 4 being unable to be roleblocked
and no, i am not openwolfing here, just trying to see it from your POV since you are fixated on me being evil
even though i may have my own agenda, you should still consider the factuality in my posts and try to be productive in the event that i am town
or you can just tunnel me to death just like with osie, and see how many more people you get killed
But its not factual. Reads are not factual, there is no hard mech info to influence reads. They are your opinion and acting like they aren’t is dishonest.
the post is commenting on what someone said
TL said what i said he did - therefore it’s a fact
so yes, my read on TL is an opinion
the reasons why i have that opinion, however, are factual
I think at this point I should just accept you aren’t actually gonna accept reason. So I’m gonna be the bigger man and stop this. You’re just gonna use this to shade me/say my reads are bad so I’m not gonna go along with it.
Anyways
@TrustworthyLiberal I do think you are slanking a bit though, I would like to hear from you.