Its not confirmation bias, its more that your already showing your scumAI imo. I mean, you could have said different things, and focusing on the pocket, instead of the LAMIST comment of RQS and the TvS comment, already shows to me, that your trying to get on my good side, instead of scum hunting
I will not talk an ongoing game. Bringing up an ongoing game is against site rules.
3 Likes
LAMIST is essentially when someone points out their pro-town actions as a way to defend themselves against accusations. Everyone here uses that term extremely liberally.
4 Likes
Solicās looking wolfy to me if anybody cares.
Notice that in the entirety of Solicās last post he draws absoloutley zero CONCLUSIONS from any of the things he quotes. Itās not a villagery thought process that leads to that imo.
I would have called it out from any other player, but it doesnāt strike me as AI from you. Prereads were asked and they were given.
Itās not though, if someone does something nearly always as Town but never as scum then you look for that, do you not think it means anything? Also when you said it was NAI for ici are you trying to defend a town to get credit?
I saw those sarcastic likes on Mathbladeās post, so Iām giving it to you all. You want the prereads, Iām here to provide.
Solicās posts have actually drawn very little conclusions from what heās seen, it feels fence-sitty and like heās trying to appear villagery without having to actually form reads.
@Solic youāve never done this āpre-readā thing before, could you please stop because itās anti-village as fuck.
I donāt see how deflecting the responsibility to make actual content later benefits village, itās just deliberate information instead of analysis.
2 Likes