Yes. Lynch rando-slanker vs redchecked scummy dude.
Hmmā¦ why?
The amount of info i have gathered from one push is astounding. Though i wish italy did not claim
I am reluctant to hang new fruit over experienced fruit who have not contributed whatsoever
shed. some. fucking. light.
Why must we lynch a man of the faith
as iāve been saying.
Itās all elementary my dear marshall
it really is
iāve been reading too much sherlock hsbent i?
Faith in my town read has been restored
God i hate these riddles.
Hot take: fake red-faction checks are a bad reaction test because if you fuck it up, you kill 2 BD, and usually they donāt tell you much anyway.
On one hand, Italy might be the type of player to claim Paladin as CL, on the other hand, whatās the likelihood that he got CL twice in a row? Very unlikely
*if you fuck it up,
Gamblerās fallacy. Though I think heās an actual Paladin from how he reacted to both Kaiās and Ozzās claims.
The idea was to ascertain Ozzās reaction. If it was scummy I would have kept up the farce and pushed him. However heās pure confusion and convinced he was framed signals to me heās bd. Plus we can look into those who blindly pushed him
Iāve been played like a fiddle and the music came out sounding like Gwar.
Youāre pushing this pretty hard, we have three days to lynch, we donāt need to quick hammer.
Yeah but i dont want a rando killed.
but now it seems that the redcheck is fake. which i DISLIKE.
Marshal did push Ozz particularly hard