I mean, I haven’t been paying attention so I would have to read the thread.
Hi @Simon if ur making a wall please hide the details so when you reply to thirty posts and im cheecking replies on posts later I dont have to scroll down two miles to see the next reply
THEN DO IT
2 Likes
wow its almost like self meta isnt a reliable source for a read
thats an interesting word choice there, “added”
some kind of neighborizer?
technically hja’s thing is that he has one less vote on him than he otherwise would have, while yours said it means you need 1 more vote to be lynched, implying that votes on you would have acted normally, but you would just need to reach 9 votes right now
its possible it would have worked the same way, impllying a similar cause for both, but its just as likely that they would have worked differently
what do you mean the faction is different?
i mean i work off information i have
yeah that makes sense
but based off what i had it was just as likely for either
1 Like
Both seem to be the loved effect, which just means they either start at -1 or have 1 more to hit majority
logically, it just straight up isnt, in almost all circumstances
because one something is acknowledged by the person themselves, it means they knew of it at the time in which the meta is being cited
therefore the meta could have been faked
you can disagree if you want, you dont have to go by traditional logic
(that isnt like a dig at you, i can see how it looks that way)
but by traditional logic this is true. i dont think its really something debatable.
almost all can. hence the almost all in what i said
okay, what i said stands unchanged.
one example contradicting what normally happens doesnt mean that that isnt what normally happens