he played like this in tos 2 100% on purpose because he was trying to get a strong villager lynched
If I suspected Marshal was Exe, Iād have been calling him to be lynched until EoD.
and yes you read it correctly. I went after Marshal regarding his age because it would hurt him the most.
why were you going for an ad hominem attack day 1
what was it supposed to accomplish
So I told Marshal the truth via dead chat why I insulted him regarding his age in ToS 2.
I was angry and decided he needed to be spanked. Thatās why i called him a stupid kid who should be lynched.
Even when angry, I can still think clearly.
i will never encourage ad hominem attacks because all they do is devolve the game into a cesspool of toxicity
nobody likes them
if anything they make you a likely vig target regardless of alignment just because people donāt want you to stay in the game
If anything, it was to tell Marshal do not pick on me again.
or lynch target
spite lynches
( Ķ”Ā° ĶŹ Ķ”Ā°)
I see your point Vulgard. That shouldnāt have happened and I regret doing my part there.
Yet it is only with the truth that people can forgive.
bruh nooooo
damn, anstreim is an asset to have on your team regardless of alignment it seems
either he busses you day 1 as scum or he asks important questions as town
one of those is not like the others
Iām still salty
Better question is why heās sticking with the apostle claim
what was your wincon again
iāll be honest i couldnāt be arsed to read all the classcards