as much as I want CRich executed more then jailaxed,
/vote gorta
as much as I want CRich executed more then jailaxed,
/vote gorta
I re-ISOād you and this is the start of the final push [2591]:
From which he basically crumbled down [2593], [2597]:
However the contradiction came before that (look at post numbers) [2571]:
So yeah, I guess it could be viewed as you jumping on him afterwards but ehh.
I still donāt really see it. For one, I would expect you to stop him from saying that his tone on D1 was āRTā.
I dont see a world where Alice intentionally didnāt keep logs. So what ifā¦
Would you seriously consider using this on Alice N1 after she had 21 posts on D1.
yes
considering everything, what are the odds you cant get another charge
add to that removing logs of someone who said theyād tryhard while keeping their class hidden
it seemed basically fine by Italy standards, he had some actually game related posts (meta-read on Jane, thinking Derps is scum and shouldnāt be healed)
my biggest concern is that Italy doesnāt like that he can be meta-read and might try harder in his next scumgame to make up for the last one
but given that he spent all of last game continuing to do nothing as Derps pleaded with him to play Iām not super concerned about that
I think its a MF game
anyone whos ever been in scumchat with me knows im way too cautious for someone to do something stupid like that? in RM4 scumchat im doing all of the nightplans for the most part and telling people to not be stupid (mostly marshal and wazza)
if crichard asked me if he should say his D1 was a RT iād tell him thats dumb as hell or try to handhold him into doing something advanced to try to implicate a good player as being their partner
I mean, I guess I could see the argument about destroying her logs ā she did say she would tryhard.
But the logs are limited to 1000 characters and I hate that limit with burning passion, I doubt she should be able to leave us that much information. Not to mention that she more or less elaborated on her initial reads in the posts she made early.
It just seems like a waste to me, but like I suppose it makes some sense.
idk why that post sounds like im disagreeing with you
but just because i do RTs doesnāt mean i would tell my scumpartners to do RTs
have you ever seen an Alice that just decided to not keep logs?
Thatās pretty much what I expected from you. I havenāt seen any of your scum chats (because iirc Ritualās wasnāt made public?) but nonetheless.
thatās kinda the reasoning
alice is probably in dead chat screaming or cheering at me
I hope there is an apostle
pretty sure it was
im not in it anymore but you can prob find it on the rm4 gamethread if you ISO n.1
Iāll confess, I donāt think Iāve ever paid close attention to presence/absence of Aliceās logs in the games I spectated.
FoL 27
Alice caught scoom, Marshal town
Marshal asked Alice, āwhat are your logsā
Alice says she doesnāt have
Marshal brings up some really elaborate logs from one of Aliceās town games
Alice even more of a caught scum
this interaction from FoL 27 is why I doubt they wouldnāt keep logs(even if I forgot to make logs too)
links in this post, if you wanna read it
thereās a lot of memes in there tho
Itās not publicized, nope.
get pranked nerd
Oh it was discord.
You told me to ISO N.1 and I did. Give me time.