SFoL 61 - Castle of the Blood God - Ended Early, will be Re Randed(15/16)

Did you think Jane was the Vessel?

i rescinded the ā€œim jailedā€ claim, nerd

yeah why else would i kill him

Yeah and Seth actually claimed to guard me N1 instead of using Fealty.
Which Iā€™m still disappointed about.

Also Nappy I hope you are actually ISOing Gorta right now like I asked you.
It was nice of you to post Janeā€™s reads for us but yeah.

thinking of pressure voting

gonna just ignore tagging for that regard

Hey
Ive done other shit too

Fair i guess?
I think this was sethā€™s excuse for some other game in which he was scum
Forget which one

Katze answered later, not knowing that alice retracted, to have visited jane.
What do you see of this?

This does seem like a possible theory - just to be a contranarian, do you believe that this is explicitly TMI instead of Nap just being
Uh
Unoptimal in his thinking

Youā€™re still reading people a lot

Then let it die
Thereā€™s really no point to forcibly starting a discussion
Only gives more room for conf bias and fake reads
When people have shit to say they will say it, and it will start discussion

I was looking forward to discontinuing my streak of being top wagon d1
Guess thats not happening


ā€¦ and I kinda gave up reading the next 100 posts
those were my basic thoughts catching up
i am available for the next 30 mins then will be back in 2 hours after my final AP test

why do I never make it into wallposts

Do you realize that the longer we leave the thread ā€˜deadā€™, the more time wolves have to be lax and do nothing?
Our days are limited. There are numerous topics to discuss. Just ā€˜giving upā€™ and ā€˜letting the thread dieā€™ isnā€™t a thing. Not to mention that sparking discussion doesnā€™t mean forcing people to produce fake thoughts or reads. Not everyone is able to read through the entirety of the thread, and people miss things.
Pointing out cliffs that should have more discussion, or using our time to analyze and then pointing out the things we found through said analysis to start the discussion is +EV for us.

1 Like

nobody will have anything to say

people say things based on what other people say

I wish I could be that scummy

/s

1 Like

do you realize that the more forced discussion we have, the more time the powerwolves have to basically win the game?
Your situation works in a game with weaker scum members.
Iā€™m just scared that people forcing discussion to happen is: 1) Not very productive, B) producing conf bias, and 3) powerwolfing

anyways thatā€™s my 2 cents
back to the game i guess

1 Like

Thereā€™s a difference between forcing a discussion and starting one.
What you are describing is forcing one.
What I am trying to do is to start one.

But you know, next time you are around I would like you to answer this question:
Do you think scum is powerwolfing in this game?

1 Like

Also kat I re-read your ISO and found another contradiction on Italy.

From today, where we talked about him:

i think in terms of immediate PoE id argue against having him on it

And yet when I asked about your PoE, again, you said

Explain?

Also the more I read this sentence

the less I believe it.

possibly is my answer
Iā€™m still not 100% confident in you and Aroot
somewhere around the 60% mark
>Rand town
but quite destructive in cases where you are not

Alice i think is more towny but idk for sure
maybe like
75%

1 Like

Iā€™d argue that Areteā€™s/Aliceā€™s interaction during Aliceā€™s RT means the two are never W/W, therefore if both are powerwolfing, it has to be NK against groupscum.
Which I donā€™t believe in.

Being wary about me makes sense, I suppose. Thank you for answering.

1 Like

thoughts on the current PoE

or scratch that what does your PoE look like?

gorta/TBE/CRich

and by a stretch
katze/mode

:sunglasses:

why gorta

1 Like