his reply contains an explanation that makes sense but I donāt know if I believe it
specifically it is not obvious, reading the original interactions during Aliceās FPS, that he thought Alice was Fool (which is his explanation)
like this doesnāt really feel like an interaction that you have if you think theyāre Fool? (to be fair he says elsewhere that he thought it was true initially)
and like
āYou were redchecked. Make your case!ā still sounds like a fake reaction, and heās saying that he believed Alice at that point
I donāt really know how to explain it, but like, āMake your case!ā isnāt how villagers talk to people they think are close to lockscum and mechanically outed
The Fool thing somewhat makes sense but also not, because Fool faction checking someone as Cult has no reason to push them on D2?
And Fool has no reason to stage that RT either, imo ā also Iām not going to look into his wording.
Speaking of wording, the one thing I didnāt like from him was this:
Also I donāt think Iām controlling the thread because I barely know if Iām doing things right myself. Iām clearly not a āleaderā role even though people think I am for some reason.
Okay alright but I think heās within his meta and that it shouldnāt be used to scumread him as several things you sort of pointed out didnāt come as scummy to me for CRichs behavior.