SFoL 61 - Castle of the Blood God - Ended Early, will be Re Randed(15/16)

[katze]

too wolfy to be a wolf

hes too wolfy to be too wolfy to be a wolf tho

:^)

[Arete]

his reply contains an explanation that makes sense but I don’t know if I believe it

specifically it is not obvious, reading the original interactions during Alice’s FPS, that he thought Alice was Fool (which is his explanation)

@Chloe

Frankly I think I should just out my red rn since they already posted.

The track thing was an FPS and I was going for a Kokusho’s gambit to see how my red reacted. I’m a Fanatic, not a Seeker, and last night I checked Gaja and they came up red. So from how calmly they reacted I’d imagine that Jane was probably killed by a NK or they are the converter.

@Napoleon

Yeah that’s what I thought

like this doesn’t really feel like an interaction that you have if you think they’re Fool? (to be fair he says elsewhere that he thought it was true initially)

@Napoleon

@Arete

His initial response – ‘You were redchecked. Make your case!’ – feels kind of fake, like, that’s not how villagers respond to redchecked people

I did believe Alice on this redcheck initially, and I got a little excited.

and like

‘You were redchecked. Make your case!’ still sounds like a fake reaction, and he’s saying that he believed Alice at that point

I don’t really know how to explain it, but like, ‘Make your case!’ isn’t how villagers talk to people they think are close to lockscum and mechanically outed

[anon6348071]

The Fool thing somewhat makes sense but also not, because Fool faction checking someone as Cult has no reason to push them on D2?
And Fool has no reason to stage that RT either, imo – also I’m not going to look into his wording.
Speaking of wording, the one thing I didn’t like from him was this:

@Napoleon

I was trying to sorta play a little indecisively in order to give myself some flexibility for a believable next move, such as pushing Gaja.

But he explained it already.

[Napoleon]

@Arete

like this doesn’t really feel like an interaction that you have if you think they’re Fool? (to be fair he says elsewhere that he thought it was true initially)

I didn’t think they were Fool until after you came out with your info

[anon6348071]

Also I don’t think I’m controlling the thread because I barely know if I’m doing things right myself.
I’m clearly not a ‘leader’ role even though people think I am for some reason.

[Napoleon]

@Arete

I don’t really know how to explain it, but like, ‘Make your case!’ isn’t how villagers talk to people they think are close to lockscum and mechanically outed

[TheBlueElixir]

I have a question for Appel when she gets on, or when she sees this

she claimed to have info to reveal at EoD

was that just build up to the vote on me

or should I expect something

[Napoleon]

@anon6348071

The Fool thing somewhat makes sense but also not, because Fool faction checking someone as Cult has no reason to push them on D2?
And Fool has no reason to stage that RT either, imo – also I’m not going to look into his wording.
Speaking of wording, the one thing I didn’t like from him was this:

@Napoleon

I was trying to sorta play a little indecisively in order to give myself some flexibility for a believable next move, such as pushing Gaja.

But he explained it already.

Why don’t you like it?

[TheBlueElixir]

@anon6348071

also I’m not going to look into his wording.
Speaking of wording, the one thing I didn’t like from him was this:

what

[anon6348071]

Because it sounds strange to me.
The wording itself, precisely this part:

@Napoleon

some flexibility for a believable next move, such as pushing Gaja.

But we’ve gone over this.

[Alice]

@Napoleon

, his meta seems consistent (which I acknowledge he could probably fake as a wolf)

Stop trying to meta read people who never had a wolf game on the site.

You don’t know what his wolf meta looks like. How are you so sure he doesn’t have an identical V/W meta?

[Napoleon]

So I worded it in a way which you don’t like?

[anon6348071]

You worded it in a way which sounded off when read separately without your explanation.
On which you elaborated later.

Is this better?

[TheBlueElixir]

@Chloe

Stop trying to meta read people who never had a wolf game on the site.

You don’t know what his wolf meta looks like. How are you so sure he doesn’t have an identical V/W meta?

im going to hold you to this

[Napoleon]

Yeah I understand now

[Alice]

@katze

petting my cat

Pics please.

[Napoleon]

Has Italy come back yet?

[anon6348071]

Nope. He hasn’t been in the thread while you were away.

[katze]

the cat in question

[Napoleon]

@Chloe

Stop trying to meta read people who never had a wolf game on the site.

You don’t know what his wolf meta looks like. How are you so sure he doesn’t have an identical V/W meta?

Okay alright but I think he’s within his meta and that it shouldn’t be used to scumread him as several things you sort of pointed out didn’t come as scummy to me for CRichs behavior.