SFoL 64 - Anonymous FoL - Day 6 - The Possessor, Inquisitor, and Fool are victorious!

shes scum and needs to be csd tonigh

pepega

poison ek too

kill alice

killlllllllllllllllll alllllllllllllllliccccccccccce

its ek

Nicolas time. In fact, I’ll just go over everything Nicolas has said that I find important, as it’s a short ISO.

I already commented on this earlier, but I’m not giving them townie-points for pointing out that they dislike Andy’s opener, as it was parroting something Lucy had already said. They also don’t say why they think its bad, which gives me a tiny feeling that they don’t believe this

Unnecessary posts to/about Thomas (after consensus was to avoid them)

2 posts later. To Thomas:

Honestly after re-reading this section, it seems that, in my head, I was slightly overblowing how much they were interacting with Thomas.
Most of their posts to/about Thomas seem fine; they are trying to interact with him in a meaningful way, and trying to get him to expand his thought-process beyond his observer thing, at one point:

My major qualm with their interactions with Thomas isn’t the content of those posts, it’s the fact that they didn’t do any solving outside of this.

I already commented on this. It’s ultimately NAI, as I don’t have the knowledge of whether or not this is a genuinely inexperienced player - but I dislike how easily they surrendered to Susan in this post.

Also they don’t know who is playing, yet apparently a lot of people here are more experienced than them.
My immediate thought is ā€œthis is a wolf just wanting to go UTR and blend in.ā€

Overall… slight W lean. Give me more, give me more.

What do you want to talk about

Hm
Doesn’t seem like you’re living up to the first part yet.


Peter’s catch-up is… useless?
There’s nothing to it. The only read I see is naked:

Not a fan of this slot so far. They haven’t contributed a single post of worthwhile content.

I missed this.
Expand on this.
I don’t understand how this is AI in the slightest

eh i dont know really, i kinda found a thing to do now. But if you have anyuthing u want to ask me im all ears

Give me some people you are generally uneasy on or want another opinion on

I’m feeling slightly ISO-ey
A rare mood

Uneasy that one is easy: Mary
Another opinion on: prob andy i hated his opener as it felt formulaic but tbh remember liking his later posting so im kinda like flip floppy on him. hedge i know :^(

sorry if u did isos of either of these two already

1 Like

Like all of their content is bland from memory or saying we wasting time doing nothing with thomas iirc, and then someone made a readlist when they had like 5 very minimal posts and were offended when they werent on it. Twas weird

Like i dont think they have said a real read atp

Going to be honest
I’m mixing up a million names, so I don’t even remember if I’ve read these people in detail lol.

Will check them out now though, thanks.

2 Likes

ny immediate thought to the thing about ā€œpeople here are more experienced than meā€ is that they just feel new, i dont get the UTR vibes but more a lack of confidence. Now i know i had that for sure when i started but i dont think thats very AI

1 Like

sorry for vanishing the past couple hours, had to deal with some personal shit. catching up now, will hopefully see some new names.

Ngl kinda confusing rn.

I can agree with that, certainly going to try though :wink:

Time to go back and read everybody! :slight_smile:

VV

Thomas - I think this is the most obvious town in the game. Especially when you take into account the way they reciprocate reads–pure villager energy there.

Nicolas - :joy_cat:

Alice - Super high WiM, and I find many of their arguments ring true with me. (ie. not agenda with fake reasoning)
Ivo - They have a super pure tone/mindset, and that’s before they started isos. I’ve only read one, but it seems to have a clear progression.
Lucy - They seem pretty interested in solving the game, pretty pure tone.

Alan - Our mighty king! Anyway the way they’re handling the thread seems village.
Edmund - They seem to have a generally towny mindset. Not impossible to fake, but no real reason to believe it is.
Isabel - A few reads and some solving. I like that they are making a ā€œcontrarianā€ opinion, even though my first reaction was to say they’re scum for it. (That’s one of the other things I’m trying to work on :slight_smile: )
Emma - Some good solving. I’m not sure what it is, but something pings me that it might be fake. It’s super well explained…maybe super WiM-y wolf? It’s probably town anyways but I wish I knew what’s off about it.
Sarah - Only one interaction of note, not really able to make any conclusion. (also it involved me but I didn’t notice :frowning: )

Geoffrey - Not a ton of on-topic stuff, a few free reads. Not wolfy, but I hope they engage a bit more.
Helen - Just some interactions about thomas.
Jane - Nothing at all.
Mary - Just kind of exists. Nothing really towny or scummy here.

Susan - I don’t really like this. They seem like they are just telling people what to do, really bossy-like. It might just be style, but I’ve certainly never seen anyone with that style before.
Peter - Super energetic but somehow not solving? They just seem to be parroting and agreeing with people.

Andy - Feels performative. They say they’re frustrated from trying to solve thomas, but it doesn’t really look like they’re actually trying to do that. Also some hedgy posts.
Gilbert - They seem to have a confident read on thomas but I can’t see any progression leading up to that. :frowning:

WW

If anyone wants quotes for things I’m talking about, you can ask. I might be able to find them for specific things but probably not for tone things.