OwO?
counterpoint: youāre wrong, but itās not nearly as AI as people think it is and for some players it just isnāt AI at all
also context
take: hedgingās AI-ness depends on context + your other reads
a well-tended town garden is likely to have a mix of hedges and trees (in this case trees are strongā¢ readsā¢)
whereas a garden thatās just made entirely of hedges is more likely to come from scum
I feel like town is less likely to commit to a read since they have no TMI. At least thatās the case for me
like isnāt it wolfier to be confident someone is a wolf? how could you possibly know (unless theyāre basically openwolfing)
thereās also, like, you can have a read thatās not TMI-based and not totally confident, but also isnāt a hedge
this obviously varies by player but in my experience āso-and-so has X in favor of them being town, but Y in favor of them being scum, but overall I think X is more compelling for this reasonā is a villagery way of expressing uncertainty whereas āso-and-so could be a wolf, or a townie. or a scumneut. I donāt really know and Iām not interested in finding out.ā is more likely to come from scum.
ok I thought this was defined as hedge. this is the kind of read that makes sense to me. cuz if you go through an ISO and only point out the wolfy or townie things someone is doing and completely ignore the other thatās sus af
townies who arenāt sure of a read are also more likely to follow up on it and try to sort out their targetās alignment, because they actually care about the answer
whereas wolves who are hedging are less likely to do that
Somewhat correct, but only for our site
Itās just that our site has āanti town play is NAIā meta bullshit
i have evidence for this
that one time i single handedly won a game for town as town because i was antitown
:wowee: