Then wouldn’t that deny any possibility of rampage killing both players?
In other words, it’s GS + NK.
the world where demon uses haemophilia and attacks SDA, who is being investigated by marl
Say, assuming I am an Investigative and I have a redcheck on someone, would it be a wiser choice for me to claim who killed [X] or should I wait until I get more info while writing everything in my will?
It depends. Is the day heading towards an execution on them already? Is the day heading towards an execution on someone else you’re fine with dying? If yes, you should probably soft it very slightly and maybe make it extremely obvious in a legacy post or something that someone will only go through in the case of your death.
@EliThePsycho @clonedcheese
Why are you two voting the King instead of leaving it to the role that can poison the King? (If they are in this game…)
…I didn’t intend to make a softclaim though.
But… why though? We have a log system, don’t we?
we’ll let’s say theoretically you’re an investigative with a red
for the sake of discussion, you would probably wait until at least the second half of the day (redchecks eat discussion for breakfast, lunch and dinner) and out it if the consensus isn’t already against them
all only in the realm of possibility, of course
Welp. Given the fact that 24 hours have yet to pass, and that half of all players have yet to vote, it’s probably indeed wise to stay silent for the time being. Got it. o7