SFoL 67: Clash of Cults 2 -- Balance/Discussion Thread

imagine bearing n1

i forgot bear makes you CI, tbh

Hot take

Bear shouldnā€™t do that :eyes:

Good thing thereā€™s no NK in this setup because lolhunterminefield

1 Like

Mithras Cult gets rekt by a hunter minefield midgame

Seriously who bears N1 as a hunter?

Well it would make you immune to being converted to both Cults

1 Like

Although saving bears would be better for Mithras Cult

Corax Cult wouldnā€™t have as much trouble dispatching you if they got a Corax Ritualist

1 Like

Corax Cult proven superior once more.

Except Mithras Cult would have 0 issue dispatching you with Lone Cultist + empower

Yeet

hm

in this setup thereā€™s a decent case for that, tbh

this last rand i just did had 5 butler rolls (obviously i rerolled the last 2 but lol)

only 2 archers/knights this time though!

oh and finally an EK

The intention of this setup was to test the Cult power level against the default FoL classes, wasnā€™t it?
Should probably be kept as is even if I agree that it seems absurd, especially if 3 hunters roll.

tbh randing virtuous is easier than this because thereā€™s less chances for multiples given the high amount of town classes

Which EK.

iirc the original intent was to test out cult changes

CoC1 was around the time cult points were getting yeeted out

image

last roll had 0 offensives

now we have 5 :eyes:

1 Like

Why does the rand keep skewing in one direction lmao.
Itā€™s feast or famine for class types.

Actually Iā€™m tempted to look at the test rand for virtuous

shrug

not a single roll with both Mystic and Priest yet either

but every roll excluding one has rolled one of Mystic/Priest twice

:eyes:

1 Like

meanwhile the test rand I did for SFoL 62 gave me like 3 groups of 3 while somehow being scum sided

1 Like

The most important question is: did the Cult roll :^)

Yes it did with a starting Seeker