tbh agree
because BD losing maj on d3 is wack
Are we talking about forums or throne at this point
Forums
I mean you are comparing an FM game to an FM game
inq (the neuts neut affects both sides), scorned(in tol evil, in FOL they are evilly good due to them siding with bd), merc (good), alch (chaotic good), Nks( evil), sellsword (evil), demon (evil), fool (evil), warlock (evil), pretender (??? meh dont care enough)
also this. We lost 12 people in the time of 3 nights. Thatās not a normal thing, and it takes twice that time for throne scum to kill 12 people, if not more.
Cover (Passive) - You cannot spawn alongside the warlock or the sellsword
Cover (Passive) - You cannot spawn alongside the warlock or the fool
Cover (Passive) - You cannot spawn alongside the sellsword or the fool
Fol should be balanced around larger scale games 16 players donāt work well honestly for the fol setup.
21+ player games are perfect for the fol setup.
Do we even have the playerbase for that?
18p is something i support, large but not too large to burden hosts
yes
no
we can make 18p work though
Iām getting conflicting answers here.
21ps can fill
see drfm
Yes, there was no conversion.
Yes, it is a good thing to make up for that.
No, it does not mean you can combine cultās massive numbers with unseenās uniqueness and power and create a dayvig strongman werewolf arsonist
it was also due to bad protectives/healers not healing/protecting the right targets, and nobles not using double lynch to properly solve thunderdomes. You all would have had a way better chance with better night actions
21p Is fine for most hosts aslong as there arenāt loads of games going on at once.
We can get 21+ players
Then we canāt run more than like 2 games of anything at once, including miscs
itās hard, but we can use ultimate pick 2 for a gauge, 19 signs plus backup and the host is active
valid