This video is great tbh
Oh well, Iā¦ nowā¦ understand this rule extremely good.
It should be used as sparingly as possible, but replacing out because something unforseeably unexpected popped up IRL that is now occupying a lot more time than could have previously been anticipated, or replacing out because you feel youāve been deceived by the host in terms of the nature of the game, should never be against the rules
The manner in which you did it was kind of unfortunate because it basically confirmed you as town but I donāt think you broke any rules, per se.
Thatās why the legitimate reason clause exists
In fact this was 100% not alignment indictive in my case Iād have done it as either alignment
By the way now that this game is over what happened between max and Vulgard
Like, every time I posted a read on Vulgard, I felt vaguely uncertain because I was pretty sure Iād be townreading that slot without the replacement, but not positive.
She absolutely would have.
Priestess just hates bastard mechanics in general.
Thatās why players are encouraged to keep replacement talk out of thread
Unfortunatly humans canāt not think about something
If you tell them to not do something, they will do it automatically in their mind lmao
Scum!you would have been less surprised, and likely would have replaced out earlier if you thought redirecting the Prince was a possibility.
Thatās why we have modkills
I ping the host when I ask a direct question, so itās easy to track.
I always ask lots of questions to the hosts.
I was more surprised about the fact you pinged her 5 times in under 10 minutes
Modkills are only for damage control when a force replace cannot work
Lul, I kinda understand now why this is the normal case (I still think in extreme cases Iād just modkill people tho)