[SFoL] SFoL 55: Old Ruins FoL - Completed (3/16)

Forum Matches Completed
#1742

I don’t buy that Derps ever makes that play as Fool D1 with no lynches D1. That’s just suboptimal. If he was Fool he would do it D2

#1743

Also Fool’s main objective isn’t even to get lynched :woman_shrugging:

#1744

Anyone noticed that Priestess hard defends Arete right off the bat? This has more +EV if she’s neutral/scum because we only have 20% chance for GK.

#1745

I guess I see your point since theres no lynching day 1

1 Like
#1746

Unless there’s a version of Fool that is like that?

#1747

She also somehow knew it was a unseen game before the inq said it was

#1748

The whole point of this is that old classes can roll and FoL Fool used to be like ToL Fool.

1 Like
#1749

Actually that’s a good point.

As scum in nfol4 I just hard townread dat king no matter what, because it’s either a hard pocket or defending a scum king.

#1750

Well I didn’t know

#1751

But he would still have to wait to d2 before getting lynched

#1752

It’s all good, now you do.

1 Like
#1753

If this isn’t a joke this feels really forced.

#1754

Cause like prince could exe him for that and hed fail

#1755

You made me remember the 600IQ potential I had in that game.

Ree @ dying n1.

#1756

…it occurs to me that my ‘suicide penalties on a neut king are bad’ opinion and my ‘ToL Fool is a good class’ opinion might be contradictory. :thinking:

#1757

Although I was scum reading Priestess I do think defending neutrals is definitely NAI for her

1 Like
#1758

Vulgard was the first pusher on the King, and he didn’t push because of ‘80% non BD King’ but rather Arete’s defensiveness.

#1759

Vulgard seems town.

#1760

I pushed mostly because I would have made a similar play as psycho or evil or spiteful/whatever.

#1761

Has preiestess had a scum game recently that’s not a turbo. I want to learn more how she plays as scum