It is.
I told him the game would be over if we lynched Wazza, neuts would lose it anyway
apologies, when I said that, I was referring to other moderror-free games where mechanical solving + 0 reads blew up in townās faces, not this one
No, thatās not at all what I meant. Giving logs doesnāt make you a good player as good King or scum king.
I meant I didnāt really do much other then sit around because I knew that me being lynched would stall time for scum anyway and that being passive casued more chaos.
like sfol 53 and scp fm
I could have pushed more, been active and caused even more chaos so I felt like I played poorly late game that was my point.
Granted both of those were closed, so youāre probably right that strategy is much less bad in open games than closed ones.
Yes and actually defend on the accusations being made D3/D4
Especially Samās Rampage failing on Wazza failed because you protected Wazza.
(To be honest, I though Max told me that Sam still lose night abilities even as protected, so thatās why I changed my mind that Wazza and Solic were not town anymore and was just coincidence Wazza visited Solic N3)
@Maxwell can you like, not use fancy words and give straightforward answers?
is that the most ever?
Lol
To this day i consider that my worst loss ever
And it isnāt very close
It was not about whether you were a good King or not, but about the trust. My mind is very simple; if I donāt get what I want from you, then itās fine. I will nag about it, but you can shut me up with your good answer of āWhat good will it do if I do what you say?ā
But if other people donāt get what they want, then itās just a sign to be lynched / killed.
Do you know whatās also fun? Playing royal blood passive class.
Especially you wanna run for king nominations and coincidentally eliminated political opponents?
Ah my drunk play was great memory of mine.
