[SFoL] SFoL 57: Last Stand of the Virtuous [Canned]

Then quote them

Okay, but it’s in theory.

^ This is false as they have redirection immunity except the BD Killer, I didn’t realise that at the time.

@SirDerpsAlot Tell me what we’d be able to definitely find out if every town wrote logs, or let’s just say we knew DatBird wrote logs.

It’s literally on the page.
It’s not a trick question.

Who he debbed

…okay. I think that we have gone off-trail of whatever else we could’ve talked about.
I won’t deny the importance of role-hunting and seeking the truth, but this is too much tunnel on logs.

Uh… at least you answered. That is what I thought as well.
What it tells us is

  • Limits the NK PoE to 2 NKs, allowing us to co-ordinate nights actions and be wary of what potential they have.
  • Tells us who may have had intention to kill DatBird.
  • Tells us who most likely didn’t kill DatBird (being me as an example, I would be jailed at the time and therefore cleared of NK.)

So, if every town wrote logs, we’d be guaranteed to know if a log-clearing NK was alive and we’d also have a clear on whoever the person was jailed is.

Why do you assume so hard he Debed to himself hm?

I don’t see why they’d kill DatBird, so I assumed redirection.
Which is actually impossible as the two top NKs that do clear logs are redirection immune.
So someone had intent to kill him.

Unless we believe that they’d proc CtA and use it on DatBird.
Not happening.

Of course, it could easily be a waste of time looking for intent as we don’t actually know if he wrote logs or not.
Which is why people should start writing logs.

Did Kyo just slip as the killer?

He’s speaking String Theory’s language

hiss!

I was literally jailed.
I can’t be the killer.

Either way, where do you think the slip was?

…hey @eevee_bot, who did you occ last night?

I think Kyo is the killer or on a team with them.