[SFoL] SFoL 63 - Triple Threat: Virtuous - Game Over (4/26) - Blue Dragon (evils) win!

/Dayvig Wazza

not again >:(

Alright I’ma stop this probability conversation, less than 50% just means unlikely and just because a wagon is unlikely to be pure doesn’t mean that the wagon is impure. There are so many factors that change the probability of town purity on a town.

Does no one else think PK is a good yeet?

I mean, the last time I read PK I read them correctly (but had been pushing them so had to continue) so I could try to again I guess.

Based on his more recent messages, you could be right about PK being a good yeet, but the thing is his inconclusive action is the only thing I would be scumreading him for.

Do you want a neon ā€œI am scumā€ sign around his neck?

Sure, convince me

That was Sarcasm

1 Like

Ok imma go now.
I just want to say
We will never lonch TBE, PK or Alice here.

1 Like

Why not pk?

hello

Gorta ISO

This suggestion was towards Blue’s hope to win and Chloe’s response that very few people would see it, primarily. This may be seen as a towny post, but I’ll reserve opinions for now.

This isn’t really important in terms of gameplay, but I just wanted to give my idea on this post. If a post is prewritten after the game has started and thus players know their class, it’s not NAI at all. If they wrote it prior to learning their alignment, it has to be NAI. You can’t townread somebody for being a towny person in a previous game or outside of a game.

Keep in mind that this is all in one post of Gorta’s. And yes, this is a correct fact, you can’t just ignore the king. The king always has a potential to be evil. 40%, in this case.

Asking this question to the bleed victim is stupid. The bleed victim can’t know why they were bled unless they were in contact with the bleeder, in which case they wouldn’t be bled.

Are you scumreading Vulgard from last game? That doesn’t work.

Not on the first day.

Also a towny line from Gorta, still in the first post.

From Gorta’s first post, I’ve had more towny vibes than elsewise from him.

Alright, this post is just following the mood of the thread by that point. It may seem strange, but I’m leaving this post as NAI.

Is it guaranteed to be W/W?

This seems like common sense, but I haven’t really read a lot of thread, so I may be missing something.

Because the HOB isn’t the only potential evil alignment, duh.

Well, I missed something. I suppose the logic follows that Seth bled Vulgard, but is there further evidence to incriminate either of them other than ā€˜I have a feeling’?

This sounds familiar.

I thought we weren’t supposed to discuss alignments.

This was in response to a question of Gorta’s meta. Leaving meta out of it, Gorta seems mostly towny to me so far, if a little aimless.

First seriously somewhat wolfy post from Gorta.

Excellent idea.

This was about Gorta’s opinion on Cheese.

I’m planning to go through each person in turn.

I’m still waiting

ugh I dont read up for a few hours and now there’s 700 new posts :upside_down_face:

I don’t really want to read up on that, could someone summarize?
Or should I just read it?

Otherwise I’ll probably just start doing massiso

A good chunk was me and Seth going at each other.
But I think you should read it all anyway

hey you’re finally here
now lets take a look at this…

you miss the point

what does this mean

you miss the point again

help he keeps missing the point

I took yesterday for myself.

Maybe you miss the point I was trying to make, which was different to your point.

So did PKR claim a N0 check?