[SFoL] SFoL 63 - Triple Threat: Virtuous - Game Over (4/26) - Blue Dragon (evils) win!

/Dayvig Wazza

not again >:(

Alright Iā€™ma stop this probability conversation, less than 50% just means unlikely and just because a wagon is unlikely to be pure doesnā€™t mean that the wagon is impure. There are so many factors that change the probability of town purity on a town.

Does no one else think PK is a good yeet?

I mean, the last time I read PK I read them correctly (but had been pushing them so had to continue) so I could try to again I guess.

Based on his more recent messages, you could be right about PK being a good yeet, but the thing is his inconclusive action is the only thing I would be scumreading him for.

Do you want a neon ā€œI am scumā€ sign around his neck?

Sure, convince me

That was Sarcasm

1 Like

Ok imma go now.
I just want to say
We will never lonch TBE, PK or Alice here.

1 Like

Why not pk?

hello

Gorta ISO

This suggestion was towards Blueā€™s hope to win and Chloeā€™s response that very few people would see it, primarily. This may be seen as a towny post, but Iā€™ll reserve opinions for now.

This isnā€™t really important in terms of gameplay, but I just wanted to give my idea on this post. If a post is prewritten after the game has started and thus players know their class, itā€™s not NAI at all. If they wrote it prior to learning their alignment, it has to be NAI. You canā€™t townread somebody for being a towny person in a previous game or outside of a game.

Keep in mind that this is all in one post of Gortaā€™s. And yes, this is a correct fact, you canā€™t just ignore the king. The king always has a potential to be evil. 40%, in this case.

Asking this question to the bleed victim is stupid. The bleed victim canā€™t know why they were bled unless they were in contact with the bleeder, in which case they wouldnā€™t be bled.

Are you scumreading Vulgard from last game? That doesnā€™t work.

Not on the first day.

Also a towny line from Gorta, still in the first post.

From Gortaā€™s first post, Iā€™ve had more towny vibes than elsewise from him.

Alright, this post is just following the mood of the thread by that point. It may seem strange, but Iā€™m leaving this post as NAI.

Is it guaranteed to be W/W?

This seems like common sense, but I havenā€™t really read a lot of thread, so I may be missing something.

Because the HOB isnā€™t the only potential evil alignment, duh.

Well, I missed something. I suppose the logic follows that Seth bled Vulgard, but is there further evidence to incriminate either of them other than ā€˜I have a feelingā€™?

This sounds familiar.

I thought we werenā€™t supposed to discuss alignments.

This was in response to a question of Gortaā€™s meta. Leaving meta out of it, Gorta seems mostly towny to me so far, if a little aimless.

First seriously somewhat wolfy post from Gorta.

Excellent idea.

This was about Gortaā€™s opinion on Cheese.

Iā€™m planning to go through each person in turn.

Iā€™m still waiting

ugh I dont read up for a few hours and now thereā€™s 700 new posts :upside_down_face:

I donā€™t really want to read up on that, could someone summarize?
Or should I just read it?

Otherwise Iā€™ll probably just start doing massiso

A good chunk was me and Seth going at each other.
But I think you should read it all anyway

hey youā€™re finally here
now lets take a look at thisā€¦

you miss the point

what does this mean

you miss the point again

help he keeps missing the point

I took yesterday for myself.

Maybe you miss the point I was trying to make, which was different to your point.

So did PKR claim a N0 check?