[SFoL] SFoL 63 - Triple Threat: Virtuous - Game Over (4/26) - Blue Dragon (evils) win!

Current VC

Voted Voters Votes
Vulgard SirDerpsALot 1/14
Leafia Soulshade55r, Italy 2/14
Sulit Vulgard 1/14
PokemonKidRyan Zone_Q11 1/14
an_gorta_pratai Centuries 1/14
PsychoKang Moleland 1/14
Alice Insanity, PokemonKidRyan 2/14
Magnus Light, Leafia, PsychoKang 3/14
Surge Wazza 1/14
Insanity Alice, Surge, ATNoName, Frostwolf103, Whysper 5/14
Soulshade55r N.1 1/14
an_gorta_pratai TheBlueElixir 1/14

Ah, I see.

His posts were wolfy, but I didnā€™t say Gorta himself was.

1 Like

Okay, am read up!

might interact for a bit and then start isoing

hi ash

hai soolit

It should, but I want everyone to know this because some still do this.

What are your reasons for suspecting me?

She also usually dies early if town, so I think she becomes a concern around day 3-4. I have noticed that she tends to pocket LHF as scum though, so keep a watch out for that.

I am not, but I was saying that Vul is a obvious wolf when scum (just look at FoL 29). In FoL 29 I was thinking of how to save Vul from the lynch because he was fairly obvious.

Itā€™s a game with 2 scum factions, so there is a chance that wolves will bleed wolves

Yes, but the problem comes when people clears someone for not having w/w interactions with outed wolf, so to fix that I proposed a system of clarifying group scum interactions based on said scum team. Maybe X is not BD with Y, but X could be HoB with Z.

Yeah, but they can easily mech confirm themselves, so if you clear people on mechanics alone you introduce them into town core and they can guide discussion away from their friends and such.

You have to see the context. That was in response to PK not including any low posters in his PoE, so thatā€™s why I said what I said. When you donā€™t include low posters in your PoE you run the risk of wolves escaping your PoE, which is why I asked for PKā€™s reasoning. Italy is exactly the proof needed to prove this point.

1 Like

/Vote Pkr

Might change this once going through seth because I think half the read is based off how they interacted with seth.

Anyway I think here I wanna go with seth or pkr rn.

Intriguing.
Well, so far I have a vanity vote and you so ehhh, I feel absolutely no pressure tbh.

I made a small Isos dive on Pkr if anyone is interested into why I think that seth vs Pkr is likely or currently a W v T or a W V W (not on the same side)

Well I hope you do feel pressured soon I donā€™t want a free ride on you my bud

Look, it is well established how I feel about Seth as a player.
To think I would sacrifice myself as scum to get rid of him isā€¦ ridiculous to say the least.

Hey, if you need a ride to victory then I will try my best.
Just hope you can get on a wagon to scum ville at some point.

I am going to get some food, but I will be back in a few hours

1 Like

I just certainly donā€™t think itā€™s TvT at this point or at least you two are having a bad time reading each other

I actually think this will give us a good lead d2.

Then look to it D2.
We already have Sethā€™s claim and as I said to him before, if I am wagoned and forced to claim, I will guarantee people are gonna be mad.

I donā€™t wanna just blindly jump on the seth wagon without Isos diving him first.

Seth claiming poacher is eh? Iā€™m trying to ignore hard claims for now and read a player based on interaction. I just feel like with the way you acted that itā€™s not a TvT

Of course this could change based off seth but If Iā€™m town reading seth Iā€™m almost 90% sure Iā€™m going to scum read you, I guess that depends though

I meant 90% sure Iā€™m going to scum read you if seth is a townie read

I was doing something before i realized Whysper didnā€™t give explanation about why he or she is voting insanity. @Whysper tell us why?

Tbh Whysper has been pinging me a bit because it is like they are trying to stay in the shadows.