Overall meh analysis, and conclusion isn’t too impressive or interesting.
Not convinced, but atleast you’re doing stuff.
Overall meh analysis, and conclusion isn’t too impressive or interesting.
Not convinced, but atleast you’re doing stuff.
Yes.
Intensify, what do you think of Ciri? From reading Whysper’s posts… Ciri just voted you and poof and then did the same thing on PKR.
Scumlean.
Shade and sitting on the sidelines.
Intensify, what do you think of Ciri? From reading Whysper’s posts… Ciri just voted you and poof and then did the same thing on PKR.
Ciri replied to me later about it
@Whysper i for some reason no longer have the notification of a reply to you but when backreading during the night i remembered that you asked me to give my reasoning as to why intensify has weird vibes
it’s because his posts feel very ‘performative’, although i think a better word to describe them would be ‘fabricated’
an example of this would be how he phrases his post on leafia giving a contradiction as meaning they’re solid scum
the way his posts are don’t sit right with me
This was Ciri’s reply on the Intensify vote.
They did?
I also had some similar thoughts about Intensify seeming performative at times.
Oof, it seems I didn’t pick the context of that post in time.
Interesting post.
Leaf is scum.
They just contradicted themselves
Ciri needs to explain why they feel this post is “performative” or “fabricated”
Intensify appears to focus more on the analytical side, if you think they’re scum then you probable should look more how they do their thinking!
I’m not sure if that was the only post Ciri was talking about. But I guess they took it as you being too firm on calling Leafia scum just for that contradiction.
I don’t find anything performative about that particular post though.
I mean.
Maybe at first glance.
But problem is, the context is completely missing.
Were we debating whether or not to clear Leafia for not knowing the scum King knows thier scummates or something or the other way around.
Leafia making a contradiction there is justified since that literally outs that they were pretending to think X way to clear themselves.
Intensify:Anyways.
Imma go do what I originally planned to do and go look at past Leafia games.
I currently have 4 tabs open, 1 for each game.
Deus Ex 4 - Leafia Scumgame
SFoL 65 - Leafia Scumgame
Wild West - Leafia Towngame
Joat^2 - Leafia TowngameI’ll get back to this thread soon once I read through and analyze everything.
Leafia:Stupid phone updating without warning. What Intensify is doing now is a good look for him honestly.
I was leaning Intensify as town earlier for his posts, which felt like he was getting right into questioning and solving. But now this post feels weird. He is giving too much detail into his process like he wants to particularly highlight his efforts. It would have been enough to just say he’s going back to looking into Leafia.
This was something I said about Intensify earlier and Ciri liked my post, so I’m assuming they also agreed with this seeming performative as well. But later posts from Intensify make me feel better about him again.
So Ciri may have changed opinions as well. And I don’t see as much of a problem with Ciri voting Intensify during that time period.
Yeah, I agree there was all that context. So I wouldn’t pick out that as an example of a performative or fabricated post really.
Oh, I see. I thought they were watching from the sidelines and putting votes for the sake of it.
If they had been doing that, I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have voted Intensify but someone else that was already under some suspicion.