[SFoL] SFoL 67: Last Stand of the Virtuous III - Endgame - The Unseen and The Senex are victorious!

Do you guys know who ghost bringer back is, or are you just being rude for the sake of it?

No wtf.

Youā€™re literally thinking Iā€™m scum because I donā€™t have the exact same reads as you.

nobody knows atm.

No idea.

Iā€™m not speculating cause itā€™s pointless.

Good, good

??? what

I have cloned as locktown and Iā€™m not expecting you to have that read. I also have PKR as townlean which I wasnā€™t even expecting.

Well.

This post seems to signify that ā€œif I donā€™t read it your way, I must be scummyā€

Yeah because you have 10 nulls despite pressuring lowposter.

Legit 4 of them can go out of null.

also this

and this.

even though i dont see you asking whether every fluff post is a joke or actually serious.

Yeah because there something called reading properly. Do you see how doublechecking could be useful?

anyways Iā€™m done with Intensify.

Send him to deepest hell of this world and move on.

Wazzaā€™s ISO isnā€™t AI for me.

Iā€™m sorry but, mech solving against a person whoā€™s probably flipping Fool, tells me almost nothing.

Coconutā€™s spew though?

That tells me something about Wazzers actually.

Iā€™ve gone over Leafia day 1 and listened to PKRā€™s advicew.

Your coconut read accusation doesnā€™t even make sense?

Why should Gorta be lock town as well?

Iā€™ve discussed this, I really do not think their emotional reaction is AI at all.

Some other posts might be though.

Okay and Iā€™m not interpting the same posts your way.

Do you not see the problem of expecting someone to double check everything when they have no reason to.

I have literally never seen anyone go through fluff and ask if itā€™s serious or not, because itā€™s dumb and pointless unless you have a reason to suspect it might not be fluff, which I did not.

I will go and find you more performative posts of yours after this post

Your ā€œconclusionā€ was very opportunistic and performative. You didnā€™t even properly analyse Leafiaā€™s PoV; you just leapt at something you thought you could scumread.

Will do.

No; they couldnā€™t if it was 30m before EoD. But it wasnā€™t 30m before EoD when Ciri appeared, it was 1 hour and 15 minutes. She wouldā€™ve had enough time to quickly case PKR with 1 hour and 15 minutes but she didnā€™t.

1 Like

Alright thank you.

Leafiaā€™s PoV at the time was either ā€œKing knows about their scummatesā€ or ā€œScummates know if King is their scumā€ which I assumed was the latter.

Not sure what much you want me to analyze considering the time and moment of the posts.

Couldā€™ve swear it was 30 minutes before EoD but shrug.
Ciriā€™s Silviu wagon clearly failed though.
If they wanted to try harder, the couldā€™ve stuck with Silviu who was probably much easier to lynch than PKR in this scenario.

1 Like

This post is performative. All it does is detail your theory about how youā€™re going to read Leafia, which isā€¦ counter-productive. Actuallyā€¦ your entire handling of Leafia d1 was performative.
What even was your conclusion of Leafiaā€™s games?

Already explained how this is performative

You just gave a townread to Bacon for absolutely no reason other than you couldnā€™t be bothered reading them and so you threw them in a townpile
You didnā€™t actually try to analyse Bacon you just gave a read.

These are some more examples of performative posts in your first 100 posts for your ISO

1 Like

Btw, I still read bacon scum

1 Like

His interactions with coconut, randomly deciding that he was town, and not being useful all 3 days

1 Like

Itā€™s not that you are performative overall
Itā€™s that your handling of some slots is very peformative
Especially so with mine today and Leafiaā€™s yesterday