Okay and Iām not interpting the same posts your way.
Do you not see the problem of expecting someone to double check everything when they have no reason to.
I have literally never seen anyone go through fluff and ask if itās serious or not, because itās dumb and pointless unless you have a reason to suspect it might not be fluff, which I did not.
I will go and find you more performative posts of yours after this post
Your āconclusionā was very opportunistic and performative. You didnāt even properly analyse Leafiaās PoV; you just leapt at something you thought you could scumread.
Will do.
No; they couldnāt if it was 30m before EoD. But it wasnāt 30m before EoD when Ciri appeared, it was 1 hour and 15 minutes. She wouldāve had enough time to quickly case PKR with 1 hour and 15 minutes but she didnāt.
Leafiaās PoV at the time was either āKing knows about their scummatesā or āScummates know if King is their scumā which I assumed was the latter.
Not sure what much you want me to analyze considering the time and moment of the posts.
Couldāve swear it was 30 minutes before EoD but shrug.
Ciriās Silviu wagon clearly failed though.
If they wanted to try harder, the couldāve stuck with Silviu who was probably much easier to lynch than PKR in this scenario.
This post is performative. All it does is detail your theory about how youāre going to read Leafia, which isā¦ counter-productive. Actuallyā¦ your entire handling of Leafia d1 was performative.
What even was your conclusion of Leafiaās games?
Already explained how this is performative
You just gave a townread to Bacon for absolutely no reason other than you couldnāt be bothered reading them and so you threw them in a townpile
You didnāt actually try to analyse Bacon you just gave a read.
These are some more examples of performative posts in your first 100 posts for your ISO
Itās not that you are performative overall
Itās that your handling of some slots is very peformative
Especially so with mine today and Leafiaās yesterday