How so? I want to hear your thoughts on it.
Well for if Ciri flips towns, youāre saying that I look townier because Ciri suddenly revaluated me as town, and you decide to look at what Ciriās alignment is, rather than her reasoning for trāing me.
If Ciri flips scum, youāre saying me and Coco look scummier.
Not sure about Coco, but you think Ciri flipping scum means we both have GS potential, when this type of move doesnāt make sense from W/W partners.
Because flipping them will help me read Coconuts and Intensify better, two slots that Iām conflicted on.
I mean I can sum it up pretty nicely for you if you want.
They say Iām W day 1, doesnāt provide explanation.
Later says itās because my post feels performative.
Takes one post from my ISO as an example, ignoring the context and saying it looks performative.
I literally debunk it by showing that the context the post was in makes perfect sense.
Day 2 comes.
GGhanaās trial ends.
They vote PKR (who had 1 vote on them at the time) over me super early, even though I was a scumread for the, and PKR was a null.
Obviously I point this out, and they tried to justify it saying that they wanted wagons to form, which assumes that if they vote me, everyone would suddenly sheep her vote on me even though they barely explained their scumread.
Plus that and they also included an really wierd analogy
Iāll get to you on that in a bit
I think it kind of is TMI (I think they are both likely group scum at this point)
yes, but during the part where people were going over possibilities I think coconut was one of the first few to bring up poacher
Iām literally getting on whenever Iām able to get away from my family (which is like five minutes at a time chief)
Do me a solid. Please.
but I think Coconut should go first because I think they have a chance to be partners with GGhana or Ciri
Yup. Figuring out where Coconuts and Intensify stand on the alignment spectrum will help the village after all.
Iām on mobile and Iām not multiquoting.
Thereās a limit to how much torture I can endure