No it is not.
Strong play styles take control of the thread.
Iām giving weak players a chance to have their voice heard.
Even if 1 Groupscum is within the 4.
Itās still possible the other one can be lynched.
Okay but giving āweak voicesā complete control over who gets executed does not equal āa chance to have their voices heardā
Its more like
A chance to have their voices drown out everyone elseās while they decide the outcome of the day
No thanks
2 Likes
Itās for the one day of the many strong voices that get it all the rest of the days.
It needs to be unanimous, all four must agree.
If you do this it could easily backfire onto you.
Strong voices die before N4
Weak voices usually have weaker reads and are worse under pressure
Weak voices tend to me harder to read or at least less polarizing
1 Like
How about we stick to good olā majority/plurality
And dont allow 4 people (who we dont get to choose, but you do) to decide who gets executed
Sound good?
Sounds good
Glad weāre in agreement
Not only could it backfire but it should
As if they didnāt vote you there and you had your double vote you could literally end game in final 3.
So it needs to be all 4 deciding?
Ok then I need to be very confident in who I choose.
There is only 2 GS but will be another by tomorrow.
Honestly i feel like this crappy thought process
And the fact that he wants to use it immediately tomorrow rather than saving it for late-game
Might just be town seth lmfao
The thing is though.
Itās only good late game if Town is doing well.
If Town isnāt doing so well itās worst then doing it tomorrow.