Yes shutting down the other personâs opinion and you donât even know my scum meta ive never rolled scum on this website and I heavily doubt youâve read my MC game or my HPM or my MS or my MU games
I dont love having to use meta but I do it almost automatically
âŚdo you think this is AI?
when looking through pings @anon6348071 also asked this
that was one of my first posts - and I was effectively in RQS
I just needed ground to work on
but the question itself forces Ans to look on his own slot which was the point of it. Idve expected wolves to give weaker answers for differences, while V would easily point out something major. Its not all that different from âwhats your last played game and whatdya learnâ, but its more specific.
the answer âim not forcing myselfâ works. I think its Ver then Wer
it was a way of saying âim dippingâ
I was interested in what Math has done, and didnt(and still dont) really see the harm is saying it
lolololol
im not going to argue tinfoils but like
you just argued why a dumb tinfoil of non-w/w could be fake
(particularly because I know im town and im p sure emilia is which leaves a weird spot)
never finished it(though I just reworded some of it now)
the last bit
less. Like 15 minutes
I didnt want to get stuck on it, I thought emilia was town and would prefer to keep going forward>wait an hour for an RT
debunking the last 7 quotes but the 3 points Chloe quoted
point 1 - I think the bleeds are real
Yes, I consider it(1 scum bleed 1 town bleeder) nearly confirmed, sue me. Neither of them stood anything to gain by faking it. I say ânearlyâ because it could also be 2 town bleeders(and, now p much knowing its a cult game, 2 town bleeders is more possible, but also why would town bleed ans)
I dont have to even try debunk this point because its my opinion.
point 2 - I didnt post that big quotewall yesterday
I fail to see anything done wrong here. I had an idea, that you seem to see as âcould help gamesolveâ(d2). AndâŚfrom there im scummy because I can put 2 and 2 together? If anyone else said it, theyâd be scummy for saying it, if they didnt pour in hours into backreading and quoting? Particularly when someone else already did it?
This point is naught. You couldve thought of the idea. Anyone couldve. And anybody couldve done the quoting too, I lack the vision of why its confined to me, and its absurd that im being read off of this. I also consider the following highly hypocritical;
try reading me off the things you know I did, then, rather then latching onto these things.
debunked.
point 3 - I copied the quotes first.
to firstly answer the third post; I copied every single post quoting or responding to Ans. How you reached there and went into me having all of the conclusions already, I dont know, but its false. I dont think every single reply to ans will feed me results.
From there, you can tell that there wasnt a thought process along the way, so the second post is naught aswell.
To finally address the first, It was to compile. I could now easily view every single reply, and therefore draw some sort of conclusion for most slots off of that. Id think most of this was clear, given that I said id draw the conclusions in the next post.
I suppose your just irritated that I Scum Read you for only your Day 1. Thus Iâm trying to get some stuff from you today and tonight so I can have a better Understandment of your alignment as I can easily be misreading you here.