SFoL62 - Regal Lions - Cult and Oneiromancer Victory!

[Chloe]

@Arete

the perspective in this perspective is wildly inconsistent – like, you claim to have me as a scum lean but also claim that you’re ‘probably’ going to die for this, which would be a weird thing to think if that were really your PoV since (a) as scum I probably wouldn’t kill someone over a vague lean and (b) if it’s just a lean then you wouldn’t think you’re ‘probably’ getting killed over it because, like, you … wouldn’t be confident in your read …

I’m explaining this badly

the thing about how you’re expecting to die for this feels performative and fake

It isnt performative
And I dont believe you when you say you wouldnt kill someone over a vague lean

So far im the only one to directly push you
So yes of course im anxious

@Arete

this PoV is inconsistent with the one expressed in the first post I quoted and also with you not voting me until much later for the record, I saw this post right before dinner, was like ‘it’s weird that Chloe is saying this but isn’t voting me,’ and came back after you voted me

I voted you not much later
But after explaining everything i was trying to explain

Much later would be like
Hours

It was minutes

@Arete

this reasoning is fake because it … assumes I would somehow magically know how you + Blizer would react? it’s like – it’s a read on me that’s based solely on how other random people reacted to my behavior, when I obviously can’t predict the future

It seemed like fishing
And i think you wouldnt normally out that info? It - perhaps unintentionally - caused 2 people to be pretty much clear from being Executioner
Which i didnt think about until after I spewed myself as non-executioner
Its something that seems pure on surface-level but could be malicious underneath - which is the vibe i got

@Arete

‘don’t use meta to read Arete because they’re such a scary scum player oOOooOooo’
‘also Arete is wolfy because they’re on the sidelines, which is like a level-1 tell’

Im saying previous games dont matter with you
And you know that

@Arete

and this ignores the bit where I voted him for not answering (a restatement of) the same question

You never put a reason for your vote
You just voted
And you never asked the question again
Someone else did

My read is real and i do believe in it

[Arete]

@Chloe

You never put a reason for your vote
You just voted

my vote was a direct reply to a post where he explicitly refused to explain his reads

context matters

[Chloe]

It doesnt show as a reply to me

Just a naked vote

[Arete]

[Centuries]

Whenever I come into the thread I see stuff I don’t really feel anything about lol

I think Chloe is fine for now

Arete, I agree with most of what is said I’d like to see more of how people interact with the slot than the play itself?

[Chloe]

Also why didnt YOU ask wazza the question again

Or make him answer?

Emilia did it before you voted Wazz

You kinda asked the question and didnt make sure he followed through with an answer

[Wazza]

Talking about that. I’m here to explain any reads now since I got time.

[Chloe]

I dont know what to make of Arete’s responses to me because it feels disingenuous

My read is not fake
And i DO believe in it

[Arete]

okay

I think I figured out how to explain the first part of my read in a way that doesn’t suck

[UnknownTraveler]

Why would Arete ask Wazza twice if Wazza already stated that they aren’t gonna give them an answer?

[Arete]

Chloe

when you call someone a ‘townlean’ or a ‘scumlean’ what level of confidence is implied in that read

as, like, a percentage

[Wazza]

Chloe, the thing is, Arete’s vote kinda worked since it got me to come back to the thread to tell y’all that the reason I’m not posting it is that I didn’t have time to post it.

[Chloe]

Uhh
It depends

I really only put people as townread/scumread when im 95-100% sure in it

So like
Anywhere up to there

[ChopChop]

I made my dission.
I also think Wazza is scum based on the fact he failed to do anything in Allies Chat and Blanetly admitted he was a bad choice and they I shouldn’t have picked him.

[Chloe]

I take read seriously

Perhaps too seriously

But i take it seriously

[Centuries]

uh oh

[Arete]

hm

I think that somewhat negates the weird performativeness of the ‘probably’ in ‘probably going to die for this’

[EliThePsycho]

You’re finally back!

Now explain all the questions.
I’ll try and find them if you ask.

[Wazza]

@ChopChop

I also think Wazza is scum based on the fact he failed to do anything in Allies Chat and Blanetly admitted he was a bad choice and they I shouldn’t have picked him.

Well yes.

Literally everyone can say that I was a bad choice lmao.

[PokemonKidRyan]

@Arete

sure, I can do icebreakers

what was everyone’s most recent completed game, and what did you learn from it?

This was a good post tonally.
Got discussion flowing (Even if I only answered it today

@Arete

I have to say, ‘I’m going to intentionally make it so that only bad players can decide the day’s execution in case all the good players randed scum’ is probably one of the single worst ideas I’ve ever heard

like for starters … what if all the bad players randed scum …

Also said a simple thing but it is questioning Seth.
And in the following post Arete said the purpose of this post was to try and make Seth reconsider using the 4 person execution thing.
Which I liked since it had logical progression from a town perspective.

@Arete

also if anyone wants to publicly commit to visiting me tonight that would be cool

how confirming it is depends on the game type but it’s at least mostly confirming in either as far as I can tell

this is not a hardclaim

Despite the fact it was a sort of claim, it was not a hardclaim and I do not see Wolf!Arete doing thing as they could be targeted by whatever that NK is who cares about claims.

---

These are a few only but it shows where I am liking Arete from.
I do not think W!Arete does all this but I could be mistaken because Arete overall is good at any faction.