COOL COOL, I was writing up a big post but then I frickin clicked cancel and now it’s gone… AHHHH
why do you want to know what the consensus is
make your own read rather than worrying about what consensus is
I have my own read
they scoomy
i want to know what consensus to know if I can actually push that read today
/vote Cent too
Hmm well that doesn’t work apparently, I guess it’s gone
On Blizer, I think that take didn’t really look like a hard stance.
“Not great” can be interpreted in many ways, argument, read, or push-wise – hence why I don’t think it’s really AI.
It reads more like an easy observation instead of a conclusion.
Also I’m not quite defending you, I want Jane to explain their full take in detail.
Like I said I find it strange that you didn’t really refute their points and just went with “OMGUS” instead.
There’s no real consensus from what I gather.
He’s personally nulltown for me, while multiple people SL’d him on D1 – yet no one made a compelling case.
One of them reevaluated him yesterday/today (Blizer), the rest are yet to say something iirc.
1 Like
Blizer’s post gave me some funky vibes but not enough to scumread em off of it
Just funk
Arete not saying anything is a little questionable, and i definitely noticed that
I’d probably just not say anything there and let yall go at it if i were a wolf (this isnt me trying to use selfmeta to say im towny - this is me saying that what arete did was kinda wolfy)
Also i didnt TMI you
I just think youre town and the fact that you arent tunneling jane and youre saying they can just be a bad villager helps solidify that
Vote Count
| Votee | Voted By | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| EightySecond | Jane | 1/10 |
| Centuries | TheBlueElixir | 1/10 |
ping me if I make an error
I like how 82 is specifically trying to look at how people reacted to their discussion with Jane to read them rather than just using it to read Jane
I have a tinfoil about some of Blizer’s posts and it’s not a good tinfoil, but I don’t really want to go deep into it because it might potentially be harmful.
Agree on this though.
A replacement is needed. Please DM me if you want to replace in
(Yes we need a second one)
Fiddler: only activates if 2/3 of people vote them
wagons: are not above 1 vote
everyone: ‘don’t vote people, what if they’re Fiddler’
How bystanders respond to an argument is very AI of them most of the time, and I don’t feel the need to solve Jane any more than “wrong villager”.
1 Like
why does it feel like using self meta is exactly what your doing
ew
I refuse to play this game on the like 1.5/8 chance ill be occupied the following night
1 Like
this response kind of makes me think you parsed my comment as sarcastic? my comment wasn’t sarcastic it was an actual read on you
1 Like