We’ve all seen it. Someone does something so mind-bogglingly stupid that they must have been gamethrowing; or they seem to mysteriously know stuff they really really shouldn’t, far too easily and with no obvious way for them to get it. But they don’t do or say anything that makes it 100% certain; it’s possible, though unlikely, that they were just really that stupid, really inattentive, or really lucky.
Should we report cases like that? My assumption is that those reports might not be individually useful but that they can help establish a pattern, since all the reports against someone are tracked and catalogued somewhere - so if they have a history of acting trollish in previous games, they might get in trouble even if they avoided tipping their hand too obviously this time.
Or do reports like that just clog up the moderation queue unnecessarily, meaning we should only report unambiguous, clear-cut cases?