I guess our major difference in opinions comes from using meta
I’m just going off of what i see here, and i dont like it - and i dont want his actions in previous games to affect my read this game
You’re comparing this game with his last, which i cant stop you from doing, but it explains why we have opposite views
Some of his posts in particular. Let me bring them up,
I don’t see how these posts help the town solve who is who.
They seem to be about posting for the sake of posting and not solving the game.
If Seth is Town, I’d like to see him start solving and less of this fluff.
Otherwise he is a scum lean/read.
But I still don’t see how him coming into thread with his hardcarry stuff is actual mafia behaviour over being just simply bad play lol
Issue is you can never prove that
He really doesn’t seem like someone who goes this far thinking wise
Yes it’s true but you can’t totally discard meta every game it’s extremely slot dependant and motivation dependant and also alignment dependant
It varies on a lot of stuff but I don’t think that in my argument of Napoleon being willing to “improve” (quotations are the key) his town play you can use meta being unreliable as an argument
It’s more so that you’re the only one taking a stance this hard while it not seeming like you actually thought much about his other posts past his rt, like “content” and “tone” are such flimsy reasoning that are entirely subjective
I mean you can say I’m tunneling your read on Nappy over your other posts but honestly it’s more so of your post on him being the scummiest thing you’ve done
I mean clearly someone who dies d1 last game and once again is main wagon, it’s pretty LHF
My main issue is that you went further into the read meanwhile everyone else cooled off
I mean assuming you’re also town we’re both in a world of if you think x is true meanwhile I think it’s wrong it’s going to be hard to convince the other even if I show you the best arguments I can I still don’t think you’re likely to be willing to move your vote
Which is why you should be looking at other wagons in order to tell us your opinion, or just ppl in general
I’m sure that after saying that you’re logically going to start reading Frankie/Mode right
Hardcarry shit just added to the pile. Its not the main focus for why i think he could be maf. I put it in there because i simply disliked it
Cant really prove anything unless its mechanical. Like 75% of d1 is gut
I could be giving him too much credit? But I think its kinda common sense that a reaction test should actually lead to information. Whats the point, otherwise. To get credit for “doing an RT?” It didnt tell us anything about frankie lmfao
There are a few people this game that I absolutely rely on meta to read. Especially those who tend to low-post, so its hard to read them based off of content. I guess i just see napoleon as a competent enough player that he can change his meta
I dont see your argument of meta as COMPLETELY unreliable - but to some extent i do. I just know some people have it in them to change their scummeta
Im not gunna back down after like
3 hours have gone by. I didnt see anything that made me want to move off, so im staying here. I’m taking a hard stance because i feel confident for the time being. And i wanna go with that confidence. Plus, we arent executing rn. But pressure can help bring out AI responses.
I’m fucking terrible at coming up with any d1 reads, and im happy that i have something
Dont have much to say on this, but i dont wanna cherrypick. We’re both tunneling rn, and we should both re-eval. I also dont like being tunneled
It feelsbadman
It makes me wanna tunnel you back but im refraining 
Lastgamelastgamelastgame
As i said earlier. I have confidence in this rn. I’m not going to back out that quickly. In fact, i feel like scum would notice that people are swapping off, and wouldnt have as hard a stance as i am
Kinda stupid way to push agenda, and it isolates you
Part of the reason I dont wanna swap rn is because i wanna say i told you so lmao
Im stubborn as fuck
But i can be convinced. Im already noticing reasons why we have opposing opinions, and im trying to see it from your pov
Rn im comfy though
Moving off of nappy kinda relies on what he does with the rest of this day
I have a general null/scumlean on Seth rn as hes posting fluff and shit that provides no analysis
Frankie i havent checked out enough, and kinda have been brushing off because i’ve been hyperfocused on speaking to you, and… tunneling nappy
Im too tired for actual well-thought out posts and reads rn, so i’ll be looking at other wagons in the mornin’
Mobile chloe posts slowly
V
Chloe
Crich
Ami*
Apprentice
Leafia
Alice
Italy*
Centuries
Frankie
Blizer*
(All non-posters: SDA, oB, Chuck, 10_posts)
Mode
Napoleon
W
Exceptions to my “fuck meta” rule: Crich, Ami, Italy, kiiiinda Leafia
I sleep
Formattinf got goofed since i cant see previews on mobile
* = lowposters (or low content, lots of fluff).
Vote Count
| Accused | Voters | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | Blizer | 1/9 |
| Napoleon | Chloe, Leafia, Ami | 3/9 |
| Ami | Apprentice | 1/9 |
| Centuries | Frankie | 1/9 |
| Chloe | Centuries, Napoleon | 2/9 |
| ModeShifter | Alice, CRichard564 | 2/9 |
Last Votecount before I sleep.
Has Derps posted at all so far? I don’t think so.
Anyway we’ve already got quite a few wagons to study. Napoleon, Chloe, Seth, Italy, Ami and Centuries.
I mean we still have 39 hours left in the day, though I’m a little concerned about the number of non-poster so far. The number of non-posters makes it harder to sort out who is town and who should be in PoE.
No he hasnt said a thing yet
wouldnt be surprised if hes asleep (Game did start 11:00pm ET)
i saw the wagons, ones im waiting to post more are Seth and Italy tbh.
Seth hasn’t gone off to a good start so far this game.
He hasn’t been analysing people’s interactions so far and his posts are kinda more fluff than substance.
Mind you that can easily change before EoD, though if that isn’t the case he is a 100% SL/SR.
I don’t know how to insert gifs on here so pretend I posted something really topical and cool.
'sup nerds
.
