This feels overly performative. Also, the diction is weird, as well.
This… doesn’t do anything. Add on to the question at the very least.
Once again, performative. Not very close to hammer (5 away), so what was the point?
The idea behind the Frankie read is actually pretty good.
The vote isn’t that bad, either. It’s going off of the wagon that was gaining steam, and pressuring a low-poster.
So, first off, this was in response to Centuries saying you’re just using certain words to seem like you’re doing something important… in which you used “agenda-y” and “discredit” despite the fact that you weren’t really don’t anything at the moment. I’m not sure what he would’ve been discrediting.
Here’s his first post. Could be a joke and probably was as I don’t think he was serious here.
Second post where he mentions his reads. A good look for him honestly. Although he seems a bit conflicted on a few people, like he’s afraid of being wrong. Could be a slight scumtell. Hard to say for sure though. Not sure why he thought Nappy was in any danger of being lynched.
This ISO on Centuries isn’t the worst… Definitely not as bad as her previous ISO’s. There’s some hedge going on, but not enough to make me just scream “well this is TMI”.
Also showing progression on Mode, and looking for opinions. @Leafia would you be against an ISO on Mode? I’d like to see your thought process.
An ISO on Mode would help a lot actually. I think I’ll do one tomorrow when I’m not so sleepy. I’m not so sure I like how fast the mode wagon is growing to be honest. It feels like CM2 all over again. We need a counterwagon to help show wagonomics. I nominate Centuries.