I mean I don’t know how you expect any player who is even remotely competent to react with anything other than “that’s a terrible reason to scumread me” regardless of their alignment. I think it’s a bad RT is all. I’m just trying to figure out if that makes you scummy or not.
I mean clearly Alice actually went back on her read while Chloe took an actual stance so I think Alice is town there meanwhile Chloe scum
Her side is mindlesssly pushing someone who she thinks is scum while being very agenda-y
Can you quit trying to teach me how to play the game?
I asked why Frankie voted me.
They didn’t call me wolf but they seemed more pissed at my reasons for voting them.
I feel like there are several things a wolf might have done differently (such as pushing more agenda onto me?) hence the V lean.
You mean you?
RN your Null for me as I need to have more of an engaging interaction with you however I also really need to get to bed I work in the morning.
Ok, I think your reads from what Frankie did are reasonable. I’m just wondering why you thought a wolf getting pushed for that reason wouldn’t get indignant (I know that I get upset when pushed for terrible reasons as a wolf).
I don’t think it’s strongly AI of him (in SFoL61.5 I made the mistake of strongly TLing someone I shouldn’t based on an RT), but I think the odds of it are more likely to come from town than scum.
Not all wolves can fake it.
/vote Chloe
I’ll just park a vote on here since Alice isn’t getting much attention. Will read more into Chloe later
Eh I feel a little better about Napoleon. Ima head to bed and reread this whole thing in the morning.
I’ve highlighted why Chloe and Alice stick out to me. They should know (They’ve played with me quite a bit) that I wouldn’t normally genuinely push people like this based on their knowledge of my meta (I did this in SFoL61.5 too) and the fact that they are bringing attention to it and shading me is 
I don’t think that’s what she thinks! I would at least her her out. Blanketly labeling somebody as pushing agenda does not allow room for that read to grow or strengthen and can lead to confirmation bias, and you might be more inclined to ignore her posts if you think they are agenda. Apologies if you think i’m trying to teach you how to play the game, I just think that tunneling can be very dangerous and I want to help you flesh out your read on her better, and then decide that if her posting is a poorly justified and fake read or if there is a line of logic that can come from a town.
I might end up doing that myself, but I think it’s just best if you hear her out first and then decide, that is all. Especially for these types of reads, where you think someone is pushing without good reasons, it’s important to understand the other player’s thought process
Again, apologies if you feel like I’m being condescending, I get that a lot, but it is not my intentions.
I’m not sure what Seth’s objective is here, though whatever it is. It doesn’t seem to help solve player slots here.