Step 2 - Make a public game review

Forum Matches Discussion
#147

Fuck no

#148

I cannot stand this abomination

#149

You somehow made it worse by adding ITAs

#150

Why run a 21p mountainous when you could run a lower player mountainous game
Even 15p, though weā€™ve already run it recently, is fine
Larger games on this site are extremely dicey

#151

Larger games make backreading agonizing
And while they have the benefit of enabling wackier roles and cool game gimmicks, you arenā€™t utilizing that

#152

Itā€™s 19p not 21p

#153

With ITAs

#154

19p with ITAs

#155

How is that even fun to play

1 Like
#156

19 player mountainous 19 player mountainous

#157

I was planning out in my head making one of those pouring water into a bowl things where itā€™d be making a FoL setup where the water cups would be hilarious things like ā€œBullshitā€ and ā€œITAā€™sā€ and ā€œDead interactionā€ and other lol mechanics but then I realized I donā€™t actually have any fucking water in my house

#158

just go outside and use snow

#159

I thought I made it very clear itā€™s 19p, not 21p.
Or perhaps it wasnā€™t as clear as I thought I was making it out to be.
Hmmm

#160

I mean it could have been worse with 25 players and that ended well below 10k posts.

#161

I wouldnā€™t play FM in general so I truthfully voted

#175

Please keep this thread strictly on-topic

If you want to discuss Emoji Mountainous, thatā€™s fine, but please do it in a new thread that isnā€™t being used for the review of a different game.

#176

Iā€™m a reviewer so I also get to use the big text

#177

In any case

Weā€™re seeing a 19p Mountainous game with ITAs
Not only is this imbalanced because the main mechanic hard townsides by giving them almost all the kp, but it also puts unnecessary weight on good luck

That wonā€™t be bad in a mash
But itā€™s bad when the game is so small

And itā€™s clearly going for ā€œnot blatantly brokenā€

#178

ITAs add very little to a 19p Mountainous game

#179

in my opinion