What do we make of the single failure?
Here is the thing though, would a spy fail it knowing they were the only one on the mission?
1 Like
Perhaps. What if they wanted people to not trust everyone on this group ie: to make us suspect more spies than there are?
Hmmm, I have to think about this actuallyā¦
They might haveā¦ for each mission now do we need one fail or two?
If two spies need to pass the missions on from here then yes one spy would fail it.
Having it succeed with all would likely just send the same mission again and end up winning the game some time down the line. So having some deception on the list there would be to their benefit.
However on the reverse if it is down to one again then no they would not for the same reason as above. If it all passed with success then it is likely they would be used again and able to fail future missions.
Great, but how many do I need
@everyone I want everyone to list who they think the four spies are - from top suspect to least suspicious of your four
Ici team
Team sent: Mole, Ici, Jammy
Rejected
Simon, Ici, Unknown
Passed
Jammy Team:
Sent: Rogue, Jammy, Wolf, Finn
Rejected:
Simin, Frost, PKR, Unknown
Failed (one fail)
Wolfās team
Sent: Sketch, Ici, Frost, PKR
Rejected:
Finn, Insanity, Rogue, PKR, Jammy, Unknown
Did not get sent out
Unknown team
Sent: PKR, Frost, Ici, Unknown
Rejected: PkR, Finn
Passed (no fails)
Finnās Team
Sent: Finn, Simon, Icibalus, Insanity, Moleland, Unknown
Rejected: Mole, Rogue, Unknown, Frost
Passed (one fail)
These are my notes so far and a quick recap, I want to look into this later when itās not late and Iām not bust with something on the side
1 Like
Yeah I realized that after but I wasnāt sure if I am allowed to edit posts or not.
Is that a thing or no?
im pretty sure you can just edit it to add that information
if its been 5 minutes, everyone can see the original post anyway
2 Likes
I suppose a plausible explanation for why one spy would fail isā¦ There are 3 spies on that mission.
Hold on, let me explain. If there were 3 spies, if all 3 failed then the Spies would essentially lose 3 people that couldnāt fail any more. So one of them has to succseed.
However, due to the spies not having a chat, 2 spies trusted the other two to fail, and unfortunately only one did it.
Is this implausible or not?
So youāre saying there were likely 3 spies on that mission hence why there was only 1 fail?
It makes sense but I still hard Spyread Wolfy.
Therefore if you think thatās right, we shall have a different mission. With none of the 6 on the previous one and not with Wolfy. Capiche?
Sorry for the delay on the mission information guys, Iām not exactly sure how Noz set it up (that bish never told me) and I donāt want to boff up his plans since itās his show. He should get that info to you soon.
Only cuz I was in that team that failed you spy read me?
Heh. You donāt know about me. Iāve only had one chance to prove myself where as many people had other chances to prove themselves. I want another chance to provemyself
I donāt think that would be a good idea, particularly because I would personally trust Ici and Mole unless they are deep wolfing really hard right now I would be confident in them being resistance. I know Iām resistance so the last three would have to be spies for Iciās theory to be plausible.
The chances of that are too small for me to be confident about benching them
If you then mean mission two, how would you explain that mission and the one I sent? With all the mystery of what went down donāt you think I would send the mission with exactly two spies to insure what allegedly happened didnāt? If I was a wolf it would be easy to pick just one that hadnāt been proven yet to tag along with me and others that were trusted
thats impossible
you wont have enough people to go on a mission if you dont take anyone who went on a failed mission
