The Priest/Soulcatucher (Blue Dragon Social)

I’d ask the devs on what social means though

fair

1 Like

Spy is perception manipulation. Basically if it’s based on the players rather than anything mechanical then it’s social. If the associated feedback is wrong by design then it’s social. If it’s vote manipulation then it’s social

Oh and if it gives someone besides you information directly then it’s social. That one doesn’t have any particular abilities associated with it

But it wasn’t social when noble wasn’t about vote mutilation that seems odd

It was social before. Mystic was the first vote manipulator

Social used to be based on nightchats

Also prince mind you is killer when it has social, Offensive and support abilites

I argue against Prince being Killer. I’m the wrong person to use that argument against

1 Like

I clearly see social differently then you, you see at as a set of abilities.

Also what isn’t social nature’d about this version ofPriest, it rely’s on there being dead players to use there abilities also gaining there feedback upon death.

Also I think prince should be a special Boy

2 Likes

That’s what a class is

Getting feedback is investigative
Using an unspecified ability is special
Relying on a dead player is not associated with a particular type

but you see it as it must have voting or social interactions correct.

1 Like

It’s social because it’s using players to gain power like Noble and mystic needs other players to gain power

Yes. By definition something needs to have abilities which are mechanically social in order to be social type. Otherwise you could define Hunter and CW as social

Is Drunk Social?

Knight is social cause it uses other players being evil to kill em

No because they don’t require the state of the game to always be powerful, Noble gains power by using other players.

That’s bad logic.

I think it was decent tbh