I’d ask the devs on what social means though
fair
Spy is perception manipulation. Basically if it’s based on the players rather than anything mechanical then it’s social. If the associated feedback is wrong by design then it’s social. If it’s vote manipulation then it’s social
Oh and if it gives someone besides you information directly then it’s social. That one doesn’t have any particular abilities associated with it
But it wasn’t social when noble wasn’t about vote mutilation that seems odd
It was social before. Mystic was the first vote manipulator
Social used to be based on nightchats
Also prince mind you is killer when it has social, Offensive and support abilites
I argue against Prince being Killer. I’m the wrong person to use that argument against
I clearly see social differently then you, you see at as a set of abilities.
Also what isn’t social nature’d about this version ofPriest, it rely’s on there being dead players to use there abilities also gaining there feedback upon death.
Also I think prince should be a special Boy
That’s what a class is
Getting feedback is investigative
Using an unspecified ability is special
Relying on a dead player is not associated with a particular type
but you see it as it must have voting or social interactions correct.
It’s social because it’s using players to gain power like Noble and mystic needs other players to gain power
Yes. By definition something needs to have abilities which are mechanically social in order to be social type. Otherwise you could define Hunter and CW as social
Is Drunk Social?
Knight is social cause it uses other players being evil to kill em
No because they don’t require the state of the game to always be powerful, Noble gains power by using other players.
That’s bad logic.
I think it was decent tbh