I don’t know honestly if my idea of social is wrong I wouldn’t just put it as simply vote manipulation/Perception
Player = someone’s words, logs, votes and perceptions
Social is kind of a odd class type.
Class = the abilities and thier literal interactions
You cant classify something by how it’s used because that’s player dependent. You can only classify it by what it literally is
So clues on something besides alignment don’t count as investigative?
Yes but social wouldn’t be voting manpulation the whole og idea of noble was having a night buddy.
similar how mystic could link someone, Noble used to make announcements
Vote manipulation falls more on the player side of the Player vs Class distinction because it isn’t class dependent. A bit of a gray area but it fits
It doesn’t really fit into a social form
only thing social about Noble is seeing whispers
Vote manipulation is debatable. It definitely isn’t investigative. Twins are a self buff and thus typeless. Do you think Noble should be special?
Forcing players to vote is offensive imo
Not really. Their abilities are uneffected
Oh and mental blur is not based on gamestate. It is equally useless regardless of when it’s used
That and disguise has the same trigger for being useful as Sheriffs check
Funny how we are arguing what class type this should be and nothing to do with the class ;x
Funnily enough it’s the more important question