Umineko FM: Turn of the Golden Witch - Game Over - Wolves Win

:joy_cat:

Does this ā€œ?ā€ Seem Townie to you?
:scroll: :smiley_cat:

Or is it completely pointless?

kitty reading the Declaration of Independence

It’s pointless

I’m saying it’s part of how I type basically

Also for anyone wondering why I’m constantly using emoji’s, go check my ISO in sign up page!

I go eat Yum Yum now.
Don’t disturb me or hissssss you get! :pouting_cat:

Oh god
Seth isn’t going to tunnel me again is he

1 Like

Going to look at Spak again.
I think their take on Light/Chloe interaction is a good look for them.

This makes sense when I think this through.

Reasonable take, I can get behind this.

That’s a good point. I called Light a rand V for this push. Now I’m thinking it should be null.

Conclusion: Spak is rand V as their take on Light/Chloe is something I can get behind.

:thinking:

Light: ā€œI’m 60% confident in this pushā€
Spak and CRich: ā€œLight is trying to subtly say that their push is bad and they’re giving themselves an outā€

Then again you’ve been focusing on Chloe quite a bit so far. I would have thought you have more reads by now.

I do have more reads. They’re simply not important at the moment.

1 Like

cold take:

i dont want this to live past d1

1 Like

Ok though unless I’m mistaken, it’s hard to solve the game when you only focus on one person.

What part of ā€œI do have more readsā€ did you miss

Chloe is simply the one I think is most likely to flip scum at this particular moment in time, so I’m increasing my amount of interactions with them to solidify or deter my read.

Yes I saw it. I’m pointing out that Chloe isn’t the only person in this game.

I’m… well aware? confusion

Weewoo

What do you think of Chloe
As a player?

Why would you want to bet your life on 60%? Your post legit reads like ā€œI’m willing to bet my life on it, but maybe not if it goes wrongā€. You can’t play both extremes and expect your posts to be taken as genuine.

Woowee

2 Likes