So the answer is yes? I just wanted a yes or no answer. I donāt ask for the explination, I simply asked for the yes/no. You can give that if you want, but itās not what I was asking for with my question!
Vote Count
| Vote Target | Voted by | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Vulgard | Moleland | 1/7 |
| Moleland | Vulgard, Leafia, Wiisp, Elephas, Catlover | 5/7 |
| Wazza | Centuries | 1/7 |
| Flameo | CallMeIo, SirDerpsAlot, an_gorta_pratai | 3/7 |
@ me for any mistakes or future votesemphasized text
They seemed very annoyed at being questioned a little. Quite defensive.
This was also quite of an excessive description Iād say. Chainsaw defence??? Whiteknighting I could see. I liked the callout first initially, but in combination with the freakout to the vote, it looks a bit worse in hindsight.
I meanā¦ not true.
[quote=āMoleland, post:264, topic:83078, full:trueā]
Many commented on this already, felt somewhat unnatural.
This was a true af statement. I like this.
Totally agree. Vulgard was off here.
[quote=āMoleland, post:320, topic:83078, full:trueā]
Meeh. She* Donāt hate this post.
Maybe Iām too biased already on Io, but this feels unnatural again in relation.
[quote=āMoleland, post:620, topic:83078, full:trueā]
I liked this point.
Like many on day 1. (Why didnāt I do this fucking ISO earlier)
Consistent at least.
Hmm I wonder if Vulgard deserves this reputation. Some posts had logical inconsistencies.
Calling it massive was overinflated here in my opinion.
Double TWTBAW reads. I heavily dislike that kind of read, because it just gives a free pass and suddenly there is nothing to make sense of anymore. In some games it is also worth it to get rid of an obstructive weak town. Itās at least better than hitting more useful town. Policy lynch argument meeh.
I do like this read. Could see similar things.
Useless, I wouldnāt say, somewhat padded possibly. I wouldnāt expect this read, but I do have them in null now as well.
This whole list was just really weak though.
This was a terrible motivation for having that read.
Iām not going to go much into JOAT outing territory, but I thought this was mechanically better for the wolves, so I just didnāt engage with it.
Apparently they think Vulgard is a god among men reads wise. Very weird stance to have when they are scumreading you like they have been the whole gameā¦ Hmm this is probably the most important point of this ISO.
And then you have this weak followup. How is that consistentā¦ with thinking these simple 2 posts without any extended case would be enough to take on Vulgard, who is apparently, such a good player.
Likeā¦ they first make a readslist where they point out that Vulgard has such amazing reads that if they push a wolf, theyād be town and if theyād push town they must be scum, yet have a conditional here on the fact that they could possibly have thrash reads here.
They repeat it here.
Okay checking up last 10 mins.
Going to quote this again, because this is the most important insight I think.
I think Iām good with this.
/vote Moleland
Vote Count
| Vote Target | Voted by | Votes |
|---|---|---|
| Vulgard | Moleland | 1/7 |
| Moleland | Vulgard, Leafia, Wiisp, Elephas, Catlover, Flameo | 6/7 |
| Wazza | Centuries | 1/7 |
| Flameo | CallMeIo, SirDerpsAlot, an_gorta_pratai | 3/7 |
@ me for any mistakes or future votes
I push my reads for once after like 5 games where I did fuck all and suddenly itās bad?
Yeah, to hell with that. Iād rather push my reads and be wrong than not push them and be right.
Do you care what I have to sayā¦, did you read the last point? How does that make sense?
It also reduces spew though.
Iāve misyeeted a villager who didnāt self-pres onto me because they correctly read me town.
This is different, though, and honestly, Mole should probably self-pres here as town, so.