Your other post has different reasoning
cue all the games that have alice pushed/mislynched d1/d2 lmao
but still, why would i want to lynch someone who hasn’t even posted yet smh
Enjoy the LAMIST but considering I am town the post is either a town post or a null post. That’s why I disagree with it.
I already asked Hja why she came to that conclusion. As far as I am concerned every post I make is town motivated.
1 Like
Okay. And I’m saying that’s setting up multiple other votes on Alice to potentially have her lynched.
The vote could be put to better use on someone who is in the thread. Do you disagree?
I feel pretty strongly that Hja’s vote on them is pure
I wouldn’t completely rule out Kyo/Maxi though. It’s improbable, but I can see it happening since Kyo isn’t engaging hard with Maxi and rather with a defense on Alice
1 Like
And I said I didn’t know why someone would think that is scummy if I’m town so I questioned you why you would think that as it’d give me some information on you.
I dont disagree with last part but that isnt reasoning you gave do you think adding pressure on her would be Good to get a better read on her?
i feel like voting them would be especially pointless after all the posts, especially after some have already been voted and others who have left
would be better to prepare for the next day
speaking of which, im gonna go to sleep after i get caught up real quick
Your reason there: it created wagon for mislynch
Your reason after: there is value in voting someone else
Arete hits all the pegs for what I don’t see scum them doing, but they don’t feel like SFoL 53 that strongly
They aren’t throwing themselves about thread as strongly as I saw in that game
1 Like
‘Maxi saying outright that he has to leave in 30 minutes is wolfy’
Actually disagree with this one more-or-less based on personal experience; I feel more need to justify leaving the thread as wolf but I’m pretty sure I’ve said things along those lines as both alignments.’
‘Maxi TMI’d Geyde as town’
The bigger problem here as you pointed out is that he completely ignored it the first time you pointed it out – I could buy it being a joke but then he should have said that the first time.
‘Maxi’s vote doesn’t engage with the thread at all’
This one is the one I find most persuasive; we’d more or less shifted into actual non-RVS votes almost at the start of the thread and voting someone who isn’t in the thread for ‘interactions’ really doesn’t seem effective, since they can’t, you know, interact with you. The transition back into RVSing from not that is really out of touch with the thread and feels like scum who wants to contribute and so jumps in with an RVS vote to look productive.
1 Like
“I do not believe that what MaximusPrime did was town motivated as he is creating a wagon for a mislynch and there is value in voting someone else in the thread”
There.
So Why didnt you Bring it up there
Also that doesnt make your last point look Any better