Also, you never answered my Alice question.
There is nothing from stopping that being the motivation.
There is nothing that will invalidate a point until someone flips.
need to sleep
see in morning
I’d never lynch in Arete/Hja/Shuri today
Do you agree that there can be Wrong reasoning even if conclusion is correct
What was the Alice question?
I believe it’s mainly changed from this
He was obvious under pressure and he handled it well. He didn’t start spewing anything self-preservationist or panic.
So are you townreading him?
Alice question
I do agree. People can be townread and be mafia. People can be mafiaread and be town.
Can people be townread for Wrong reason And still be town
Townreading him? Yes. I’d go as far as to say that actually.
I’d change my vote if there was someone actually worth changing it to.
I disagree with that.
Do you think he’s >rand V here?
What is >rand V?
And if so, is everyone else in the thread also >rand V?
More likely to be village than random chance.
Everything a town member says comes from town, and therefore has the potential to be townread.
There is no way to wrongly townread a town member.
What does that mean?
Do you think he’s more likely to be village than if you literally just chose someone in the game at random?
So if I say that someone is town because they made a post And only town posts that reasoning will be valid if they’re town?
No, because the odds are predetermined. When something is randomised it can’t be changed in the future.